#Random Linux

Ice Tea said:
I've been having a play with GhostBSD and there are way too many workarounds and compromises for me to be able to use it as a daily driver.

DRM for example means jumping through hoops just to watch catchup tv.
Click to expand...
Yeah I'm not sure I'd use it on the desktop either but for servers it is pretty good.
 
What caught my attention is that freebsd still offerers legacy Nvidia drivers so i thought it might be useful for old cards, maybe i'll have another play with GhostBSD on it's next release.
 
Sounds like intel are in a bit of trouble and they are trying to monetise everything before they get swallowed up by someone else
 
With battlefield 6 being back Im back to dual booting specifically for that game. So I spent time getting secure boot working in cachyos. Once this is done I created a fish function called windows which firstly sets the windows boot choice in bootloader (limine) to be default choice then to reboot. So now from terminal I just type windows and boom reboot to windows. Then in windows in a scheduled task I mount the efi partition and set the boot loader choice back to linux so after a game i hit reset on tower or just reboot and back in cachy with very little need for any interaction. Next step is just make windows boot straight to battlefield 6.
 
As a new Linux user who uses Fedora. Do I just wait for the new Plasma 6.5 upgrade to show up in Discover updates when it's ready?
 
So I need to pick a light weight Linux bistro for only three tasks. It needs to run a firewall, SSH and KVM/QEMU and nothing else. Can anyone suggest a light weight Linux distro for those tasks please? Normally I'd either RHEL or Ubuntu LTS but curious if there is anything smaller.
 
Cromulent said:
So I need to pick a light weight Linux bistro for only three tasks. It needs to run a firewall, SSH and KVM/QEMU and nothing else. Can anyone suggest a light weight Linux distro for those tasks please? Normally I'd either RHEL or Ubuntu LTS but curious if there is anything smaller.
Click to expand...

Literally any Distro - I prefer Debian for stability on these, expert install.

If size is super-important, Alpine. Or if you're willing to faff about a bit with QEMU, OpenBSD would be the amazing at this too.
 
Throrik said:
Literally any Distro - I prefer Debian for stability on these, expert install.

If size is super-important, Alpine. Or if you're willing to faff about a bit with QEMU, OpenBSD would be the amazing at this too.
Click to expand...
Cool. Thank you. I'll have a play around. Was just curious as I wanted to keep the host machine as bare bones as possible.
 
I was going to say Alpine also, though learning to get along with musl instead of glibc can be a steep learning curve like the first time you use Arch.

Flatpaks work if you need a glibc applications but considering the size and extra overhead some people question if it's worth it on alpine as it's no longer a tiny os.
 
Fedora have opened the door for AI contributions to be made to the project. This is a hard no from me but I can now see this being the norm going forward.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom