He said that, but is that really what you want to convey to a hot headed customer?
Yah, there's a reason I don't work in customer service...!!
Apparently we still have to "apologise for the inconvenience" when digging up someone's yard, even though it's their problem they're asking us to fix, in which they knowingly caused damage to *our* asset in the first place anyway - I wonder if cops have to apologise for the inconvenience when arresting someone for murder...
I would say no. It undermines their value regardless of any extra privileges existing or not.
I'd say the undermining is from the *idea* that you'd stuff one customer in favour of another, which then begs the question - If you'll do that for me because I spend thousands in a year, what would then you dump me with if someone else spends thousands in a month?
Personally, I'd rather hear what the actual score is and know the relevant legislation is being followed to its fullest extent, since it's pretty clear and fair for both sides.
There is also so much advice on how to complain to companies now, that putting up with it and kowtowing to customers' attempts to make a mountain out of their molehill can set a dangerous precedent.
"Speak to a manager/supervisor, Tweet live about their bad service, tell them how awesome a customer you are, post on their and others' forums and contact any manufacturer Rep members, email the director/CEO", etc...
I imagine the likes of OCUK get several calls like this on a daily basis... certainly I've seen forum posts from people who wanted to RMA one thing and, knowing they were out of stock, expected the immediate dispatch of the next model up... and were quite disappointed when they hadn't gotten it all within a few hours.
I dunno - The whole thing about how much you spend just sounds too much to me like a D-List celeb asking, "Don't you know who I am???!!!"
