[REC] 2

Definitely worth watching the first one. It was deliberately filmed on a handheld camera for the "documentary" look, which gives it a grainy, authentic appearance. No music, either. A very immersive movie.

Watched it alone in the house lights down and surround sound up. I pooped myself many times, especially towards the ending in teh last 10-15mins.

Seemed like a pretty decent remake I thought.

It was an exact copy with some american actors. Not a remake, just a complete rip off ;)
 
Will have to watch the first Rec judging by the comments above, not heard of it before but sounds like its worth a viewing.

Not played Left for Dead either, will that affect my viewing pleasure? :p
 
Awesome. I absolutely loved [REC], so hopefully this will just be more of the same. :D It's exceptionally hard to make a genuinely scary movie without the safety net of a scary soundtrack, but the makers pulled it off brilliantly.

Bring it on!! :D
 
Awesome. I absolutely loved [REC], so hopefully this will just be more of the same. :D It's exceptionally hard to make a genuinely scary movie without the safety net of a scary soundtrack, but the makers pulled it off brilliantly.

Bring it on!! :D

Here, here!
 
Hmmm....
I hearted [rec *], but it doesn't strike me as a story which could benefit in any way from a sequel. I'd love to be proved wrong, but the only way is down imo.
 
I'll watch this. If it's good, great. If not, no skin off my nose. I'm sure it'll still be fun to kick back and watch some zombie destruction for a couple of hours.
 
Number one on my "most anticipated" list at the moment. Totally loved [REC] (and enjoyed Quarantine enough). Apparently the sequel is going to be much, much more vicious.
 
I'll watch this. If it's good, great. If not, no skin off my nose. I'm sure it'll still be fun to kick back and watch some zombie destruction for a couple of hours.

[REC] had a running time of around 86 minutes, so I'd expect the sequel to be equally brief. Definitely not a 2-hour bumwarmer.
 
Back
Top Bottom