Why?R B CUSTOMS said:i just think its funny how many people willa rgue with you about it being called RMS, not HMS
but have a huge book and CD's coming out my eyeballs and also a dycast model of the Titanic an amazing ship just a shame it sank... I wonder what it would be now if it didn’t ?Mp4 said:I wonder what it would be now if it didn’t ?
A pub?
Museum

Yewen said:I prefer warships really, much more interesting for me personally.
Anything from M. Rose up I am interested in really, Hood is interesting just for how people over rated it for almost a decade, flagship that was ten years out of date as our flagship, cost a lot of people their lives because of a ship that was a nations favourite.
Explains the extra ordinary hunt of the Bismarck after Hoods sinking, Battle Cruiser that was the nations favourite and a icon of the Empire, sunk in combat by a battleship (as it would be) so we had to get the Bismarck then and then for national pride.
In one go in that combat it secured the death of the large warship as the frontline of combat, Arc Royal launching swordfish resulting in the disabling of the multi million mark Bismarck, first ever fully combat ready capital ship to be beaten by air power.
Italians got a trouncing by air on their navy too, and the Japanese super battleships got taken out aswell by air, seiling the death on big ships.
Hood was a case of a nations love affair with it though, no way should a Battle Cruiser should have been in that situation in a straight out firefight with a ship like Bismarck, HMS Belfast for example was a far superior ship of war than Hood, yet was smaller. Think it had a hand in the destruction of the other big German warship of the time; Scharnhorst.
I know it is slightly off topic, but ships in general and the world wars were mentioned with Olympic afterall. I think I have gotten all the info right, is 2:00am afterall!

InwardSinging said:I was quite into the Titanic and its sister ships a good few years ago, its quite a facinating subject.
Theres even some good conspiracy theories that it wasnt the Titanic that sunk in 1912, that there was problems on its sea trials, so they switched ships, switched the Olympic with the Titanic, indeed many pictures of the titanic are actually pictures of the Olympic. There is also conspiracy theories that the ship was actually sunk on purpose, that it wasnt sea worthy and the insurance policy more than made up for it, theres evidence to suggest its true, the owner of the white star line who went on all maiden journies, backed out at the last minute, a few other high profile white star line employees wouldnt travel on it either.
If i remember correctly the Britannic was a hospital ship in the second world war, the Olympic was taken back to liverpool after also working in the war and broke down for scrap, which is a bit of a shame.
I think i saw this. Didn't they look at the size of the seperations between some of the panels. Turns out they were different for the two ships and thus in the end came to the conclusion that no switch had been made?aardvark said:its actually one of the most convincing conspiracy theories i've seen 9still not sure i believe it though) - but the olympic hit, or was hit by a naval vessel (submarine or warship - can't remember) but because it was a military ship the insurance wasn't valid and so White star got no money from the MoD for the damage and non from the insurance either - the theory goes that they brought the titanic into dock (at the same time as the olympic) and switched them (they looked very similar) - and then sank the titanic to get the insurance
the tv programme i saw made a good case, but no conclusive evidense.
aardvark said:its actually one of the most convincing conspiracy theories i've seen 9still not sure i believe it though) - but the olympic hit, or was hit by a naval vessel (submarine or warship - can't remember) but because it was a military ship the insurance wasn't valid and so White star got no money from the MoD for the damage and non from the insurance either - the theory goes that they brought the titanic into dock (at the same time as the olympic) and switched them (they looked very similar) - and then sank the titanic to get the insurance
the tv programme i saw made a good case, but no conclusive evidense.
Hades said:It's funny I should read this kind of thread tonight. Only this afternoon I was sitting outside a pub on the Thames (in sight of the HMS Belfast) and an elderly gentleman sat next to us. He turned out ot be 93 years old (didn't look it!) and had served on the HMS London in WW2. It was fascinating to talk to him. I bought him a beer of course
EDIT: Just looked up HMS London and apparently it was also involved in the pursuit of the Bismark.
Yewen said:Really is fascinating talking to people who were actually part of it, living history.
Only so much you can get from text and films, but the real emotion and magnitude of the events in our history are best explained by the people who were there.


not as if the asessors could take a look at the ship is it? 
Edinho said:As for the Bismark, ive seen pictures of it, and it just looks amazing the size of those guns![]()


I noticed that none of the Olympic class cruise ships were christened....
Wren said:I goofed on the RMS, it stands for Royal Mail Service. I confused it with Her Majesty. Didn't the Olympic get torpedoed? I seem to remember hearing something like that.
This 300-year-old coaching inn, located right in the heart of Alnwick retains many features from days gone by but still much appreciated by today’s travellers.
In particular, experience the splendour of the historic Olympic Suite with its original oak panelling; mirrors, ceiling and stained glass windows salvaged from the SS Olympic - an exact mirror image of its sister ship - The Titanic.