an obese tax might actually be a good ideaWould be so funny, we've calculated you as obese so you need to pay 500 a year tax, or drove a car that's free (tax wise).

an obese tax might actually be a good ideaWould be so funny, we've calculated you as obese so you need to pay 500 a year tax, or drove a car that's free (tax wise).
He will not be long for this world with behavior like that. I checked online, it is not a cycle path.Darwin awards?
It could have been a shared pedestrian/cycle path but even then, they don’t have right of way at a pelican crossing unless their light is green.
Darwin awards?
It could have been a shared pedestrian/cycle path but even then, they don’t have right of way at a pelican crossing unless their light is green.
But that's the confusion isnt it? Ive seen pedestestions now cross on red man at junctions because under the new rules they believe they now have right of way and the car should stop and not wait for a red light.
But that's the confusion isnt it? Ive seen pedestestions now cross on red man at junctions because under the new rules they believe they now have right of way and the car should stop and not wait for a red light.
Today I was driving back from the supermarket at around 25mph in 30mph zone. A cyclist was at a pedestrian crossing (pelican) and proceeded to start to cross as I was approaching when the light was green. I really was not far off having a collision.
He shouted at me that he has right of way. (I am not sure why a cyclist was on the pavement, but I'll skip over that one).
Normally I don't share car journey stories as 'great story bro', however if this is what the new highway code means then I am genuinely concerned for said cyclists life expectancy.
Why on earth would someone pull out in front of moving traffic when there is a pedestrian crossing with a button to press. Charles Darwin springs to mind.
That's correct. It's only on side roads.Surely the cyclist was incorrect if he was crossing the road you were on (and not on a road you were turning into), as far as I understand it, cars still have the priority when proceeding straight ahead, and anybody waiting to cross still has to wait. If they are crossing on a road you are turning into, then the pedestrian/cyclist has the priority.
That's correct. It's only on side roads.
I got to test my right of way by walking in the middle of a dual carriageway yesterday and didn't get run over. The experiment was brought to us by cityfibre who closed the pavement with the pedestrian management plan being 'you need to cross to the other side (of a dual carriageway)'.![]()
My first one tonight where I stopped coming up to a junction to let pedestrians cross, they were confused but grateful.