RYAN GIGGS

Hikari Kisugi said:
Perhaps it was a misquote, but I not hear yesterday the affair was 8 years, but she was only married to his brother for 10 months?


Perhaps that was incorrect, but frankly, I find it hard to care at all.
Click to expand...

Yep the papers chose their words very carefully to give the impression that he'd been banging his sister in law for 8 years, but when you actually read the 'small print' it turns out Ryan actually knew the girl before his brother had even met her.

Not saying that makes it acceptable in any shape or form, just that this idea of the woman having a "8 year affair" doesn't quite tell the whole story.

Finally what I don't get is why he did it. As one of the most famous footballers in the country, he could have bedded any number of ***** if he wanted to, so why did he have to keep it going with his brother's wife? I know your average joe on the street won't be spoilt for choice, maybe he gets the chance to dip his wick in his brother's bird and takes it because he fancies a bit on the side. But Ryan Giggs? Girls would be queueing up to bed him, just go with some random!
 
Ryan Giggs wife should have filed for divorce and took him to the cleaners. :D

More the fool her going back to him after what he has done. :rolleyes:
 
dmpoole said:
Why, are Harry and his 'real' Father cremated so DNA testing can't be done?
Click to expand...

No, but the Royal Family will never allow for the DNA testing to be done so unless we overthrow the monarchy, capture harry and do the test then it's not going to happen. Them doing a test would admit doubt on their behalf and they wouldn't want to admit that.

From Diana it might have come out in an autobiography or something, or a late life confession but IMO we will never know now.
 
jamiegray85 said:
No, but the Royal Family will never allow for the DNA testing to be done so unless we overthrow the monarchy, capture harry and do the test then it's not going to happen. Them doing a test would admit doubt on their behalf and they wouldn't want to admit that.

From Diana it might have come out in an autobiography or something, or a late life confession but IMO we will never know now.
Click to expand...

There are 'hic ups' in the family tree beyond Harry... there are a few corpses the Royal Family refuse to have DNA'd due to the fact it'd probably get them turfed out..
 
jamiegray85 said:
No, but the Royal Family will never allow for the DNA testing to be done so unless we overthrow the monarchy, capture harry and do the test then it's not going to happen. Them doing a test would admit doubt on their behalf and they wouldn't want to admit that.

From Diana it might have come out in an autobiography or something, or a late life confession but IMO we will never know now.
Click to expand...

Oh so you are a Tin Foil Hatter who thinks that Charles engineered Diana's death then?

jamiegray85 said:
Lol, we'll never find out. Charles made sure of that.
Click to expand...
 
I don't believe as the future king he would allow it in the future. He wouldn't have allowed it in the past either. I'm pretty sure as his current "father" he'd have stopped any move in the past too
 
dmpoole said:
Oh so you are a Tin Foil Hatter who thinks that Charles engineered Diana's death then?
Click to expand...

I think it was an accident but nothing wrong with looking at some 'who dun it' possibilities, and I think he's a mummy's boy so the head of the family would have had to order it if it did happen that way... but no, I don't think Diana's death is a Royal Conspiracy.

Kenai said:
When you say things like "Lol, we'll never find out. Charles made sure of that." the chances of it being the case are quite high :p
Click to expand...

I agree there might be a lot of stories about it, and Hewitt is top of the list but there won't be evidence released that will confirm it, like DNA tests.
 
Last edited:
dmpoole said:
I must be a CT'er also because I also think there is a very high chance of Harry being Hewitt's ******* but the poster was suggesting that Charles dealt with Diana.
Click to expand...

i read it as him stopping any DNA tests, rather than had her killed. Which i agree with (the DNA tests that is)
 
MrLOL said:
i read it as him stopping any DNA tests, rather than had her killed. Which i agree with (the DNA tests that is)
Click to expand...

It was, with an undertone of referring to other matters but only if the reader took it that way, and in jest if they did. If Diana was still around she'd be able to give the go ahead but as Charles is the only parent and Harry won't want to lose his place as a Royal then neither of them will say yes.

Anyhow, it was more an off the cuff remark so please back on topic :p

I read some suggestion on the forum about why Giggs went with her when he could have went with some randoms, the randoms would have been further injunctions and also more likely to sell their stories, while his brothers wife would want to keep quiet about it.
 
that's true.

Your sister in law is less likely to want to go to the papers about it.


Not agreeing with all the confusion about why he would want to cheat on his mrs though. I know Imogen is all fake and plastic etc.. But i still would lol :D

His wife on the other hand ... does nothing for me :confused:
 
Natasha and Imogen float my boat a lot more than Stacey. I can see why people would be split on the matter, don't think any of us here would kick any of them out of bed though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom