Everything about this plane has probably been reviewed, re-reviewed and triple checked to such an extent that it's probably about the safest plane you could get on at the moment.
Exactly what I was thinking.
Everything about this plane has probably been reviewed, re-reviewed and triple checked to such an extent that it's probably about the safest plane you could get on at the moment.
Exactly what I was thinking.
from the episodes of aircrash investigation I've watched which were probably all episodes from before the 737 max existed, it seems like most crashes are pilot error due to lack of familiarization or from not understanding the planes systems properly. (like the time some pilot let a kid at the controls, unaware if you jerked the control around in particular way it overrode the controls and the kid sent the plane in to a unrecoverable dive)Yeah but unfortunately that meant that the pilots weren't prepared for the new feature where the planes flew themselves into the ground.
If only it wasn't by the same agency that approved the original max design....FAA has lost all respectEverything about this plane has probably been reviewed, re-reviewed and triple checked to such an extent that it's probably about the safest plane you could get on at the moment.
I’m kind of hoping the European lot reject it just to see the bun fight that follows. I wouldn’t trust a word the FAA have said on this after the first balls up!If only it wasn't by the same agency that approved the original max design....FAA has lost all respect
Credit is cheap much like this deal I suspect! Boeing must be desperate to sell these right now!Where did Ryan Air find those billions of US Dollars in the middle of a global air travel slump?
The bought them in a 2 for 1 black friday sale.....No one want to fly on them, given they've killed a fair few hundred people.
I believe that one of the USPs of the 737 Max was that conversion training was less extensive than it would be on a "New" aircraft. I seem to recall reading that training on the MCAS was considered to be unimportant because MCAS couldn't go wrong.. . . kinda crazy they would fast track pilot training to a few hours unless the cockpit and system are identical to something they are used to.
I was certainly always taught that in any critical system you need an odd number of sensors - greater than two.. . . In any critical system, you ideally want 3 sources of data to come to a conclusion and I thought that wasn't the case here.
I'd rather risk COVID than risk a 737 Max.
I seem to remember one problem being a reduced number of sensors by design and software making an approximation or best guess which was the issue. I don't think they actually increased the number of sensors, just fiddled with software?