There isn't much information around about how much extra performance you can get with faster Ram on Ryzen 1, so to satisfy my own curiosity i spent half an hour testing, the results were surprising.
Just one game, i may or may not add more later.
Grid 2: Maximum 1080P MSAA 0, GTX 1070.
Corsair Vengeance® LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 DRAM 3000MHz
CMK16GX4M2B3000C15
Ryzen 1600 @ 3.9Ghz
Other relevant settings:
DRam Volts 1.41v
SoC 1.11v
PROC OPT 48 Ohms
Results: Chart made by Armageus, thank you
It seems timings make some but little difference, outright speed has about 55% scaling.
Other results from the net.
This is an excellent example with clear graphs by os4321, thank you
Just one game, i may or may not add more later.
Grid 2: Maximum 1080P MSAA 0, GTX 1070.
Corsair Vengeance® LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 DRAM 3000MHz
CMK16GX4M2B3000C15
Ryzen 1600 @ 3.9Ghz
Other relevant settings:
DRam Volts 1.41v
SoC 1.11v
PROC OPT 48 Ohms
Results: Chart made by Armageus, thank you


2400 16-17-17
Min: 111
Avr: 142
Max: 202
--------------------
2666 16-17-17 (+11%)
Min: 117 (+6%)
Avr: 151 (+6%)
Max: 210 (+4%)
--------------------
2933 16-17-17 (+9%) Total (+23%)
Min: 122 (+4%) Total (+10%)
Avr: 159 (+5%) Total (+12%)
Max: 229 (+9%) Total (+13%)
--------------------
3066 16-17-17 (+4%) Total (+27%)
Min: 129 (+6%) Total (+16%)
Avr: 164 (+3%) Total (+16%)
Max: 240 (+5%) Total (+19%)
--------------------
Timings scaling:
2400 16-17-17
Min: 111
Avr: 142
Max: 202
-------------------
2400 14-15-15
Min: 112 (+1%)
Avr: 146 (+3%)
Max: 202
Min: 111
Avr: 142
Max: 202
--------------------
2666 16-17-17 (+11%)
Min: 117 (+6%)
Avr: 151 (+6%)
Max: 210 (+4%)
--------------------
2933 16-17-17 (+9%) Total (+23%)
Min: 122 (+4%) Total (+10%)
Avr: 159 (+5%) Total (+12%)
Max: 229 (+9%) Total (+13%)
--------------------
3066 16-17-17 (+4%) Total (+27%)
Min: 129 (+6%) Total (+16%)
Avr: 164 (+3%) Total (+16%)
Max: 240 (+5%) Total (+19%)
--------------------
Timings scaling:
2400 16-17-17
Min: 111
Avr: 142
Max: 202
-------------------
2400 14-15-15
Min: 112 (+1%)
Avr: 146 (+3%)
Max: 202
It seems timings make some but little difference, outright speed has about 55% scaling.
Other results from the net.
There are a couple of good videos from the guy at MindBlank Tech showing how well it scales with speed and timings
Pretty sure it works like this till 3200 then timings start being more important.
Shown pretty well here, gamers nexus: https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwrevie...m-overclock-windows-update-efi-updates/page-5
You got the ram to go higher? 3 weeks till I get to see where my b.die can go![]()
This is an excellent example with clear graphs by os4321, thank you

I have an older graphics card (AMD R9 280X) and was curious what impact RAM speed would have.
My conclusions from basic Unigine Valley testing:
* In a GPU bottleneck Scenario (e.g. if GPU utilization is 99%) no noticeable FPS increase observed.
* RAM speed/timings help to address CPU bottleneck scenarios (similar to overclocking the CPU).
* About 8% FPS Avg performance increase going from bios default 2133 15-15-15-36 to 3200 14-14-14-34 in a CPU bottleneck scenario.
Quick observations (in a CPU bottleneck scenario):
* A 19% CPU overclock (3.2 to 3.8Ghz) --> 16% FPS Avg increase
* Ram overclocked to 3133 14-14-14-34 --> 7% FPS Avg increase
* CPU (3.8Ghz) + RAM (3133 14-14-14-34) --> 21% FPS Avg increase
Graphs:
https://imgur.com/a/WczXZ
Test Scenario:
Unigine Valley 1.0
GPU Bottleneck Scenario = Extreme HD (1080p)
CPU Bottleneck Scenario = Basic + DirectX11 (720p)
PC Specs:
CPU: Ryzen 7 1700 (default 3.2Ghz)
Motherboard: Asus Prime X370-Pro
RAM: Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3600C18 Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) (bios default RAM settings: 2133 15-15-15-36)
GPU: AMD R9 280X (1000Mhz core / 1500Mhz mem)
Last edited: