• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ryzen 2600 vs Core i9 7800X in 37 game benchmark.

Martini1991 said:
EDIT : I don't know what's happening anymore. AMD's own words aren't enough.

But I'd still like to see a review where Zen 1 and "2" are compared at the same clocks. If there's anything where there's a 10% gain at the same clock it must be a very specific scenario (Or say a game that's not consistent in what it's actually rendering)
Click to expand...

Well this is how AMD arrive at 3%... look closely at this slide and look at my numbers....

aX7cQw9.png
 
Martini1991 said:
Given the other results, this would go down as an outlier by any reasonable person.

Everytime you talk about Ryzen, it gets faster and faster and faster.
Click to expand...

Well i don't think its as high as 22% but it is higher than a few % and Cinebench being Floating Point is indicative of memory intensive workloads, that includes gaming.

Anyway... the 1305 one was at the speed you see in my signature, its my 24/7 clock, 3.9Ghz / 3066Mhz.

The 1324 one was done at 3.975Ghz

iVTgxPy.png

VGDskmT.png
 
Last edited:
Zeed said:
MAybe have a look at 8pack tests besfore posting crap or even better maybe check the damn thing you posted ??


dishonored2_1920_1080.png



hitman_1920_1080.png



perfrel_1920_1080.png



I know u are tight ass but i WILL pay extra 10-15 quid for 1fps in some situations.
If we are comparing Top amd Mainstream cpu with top memory setting its only logical to compare top intel mainstream with top memory. Does not matter if its 0.0001% difference TOP option vs Top option. Especially in both cases SAME MEMORY KIT woul;d be used.

It is OVERCLOCKERS forum ot pc world/currys forum ??
Click to expand...
I cannot believe you posted those slides and told me to look at them, as if to say they prove me wrong.

Tell me if my eye sight is deceiving me because what i see between 3200Mhz and 4000Mhz is, from the bottom up, relative performance.

3200: 101.5%
4000: 100.5%

3200: 140 FPS
4000: 137 FPS

3200: 104 FPS
4000: 103 FPS

Margins of error "almost 0 difference" no?

Anything above 3200/3400 is a placebo, you think it makes a difference, to such an extent as to post slides to prove it without even looking at them... but in fact makes no difference what-so-ever. seriously what?
 
Last edited:
Zeed said:
Well im looking on Untuned xmp settings that are highlighted in colour so every Joe can run those in 5 seconds. Enter bioss select xmp boot up.
3200cl14 You are in about are not standard settings but tuned up ones. With tuned ip 4133 kit will do 4000cl16 or 3600cl14.
We got 2 guys at ocn tryig to get 3600cl14 stable on zen+atm.
uFO from my polish forums is running 3866cl15 as daily setting with hes 8700k at 4.1. Had 4000cl15 but at 1.7 volts bit much for daily :p

Im waiting for this teamgroup zen+ 3466 kit fot tests.
Click to expand...

what does any of this have to do with what you quoted?

I'm reading it thinking.....wat?!?!?!?!
 
Zeed said:
What What ?? Out of the box xmp profile on them kits is faster . Thats one of biggest problems with ryzen only2 kits tend to work with out of the box settings :/ Thank god for calculator !!!!
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? it takes 10 seconds, select XMP profile > select rated speed and done.

And what does this have to do with 3200Mhz vs 4000Mhz memory making 0 difference to Intel's performance?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom