-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat benchmark
- Thread starter Broken Hope
- Start date
I think enough screws have been turned into the 5870 users, can any 5870 beat toms 5770 results...? I'm bored of people saying they wont use xfire 5770 for low framerate let see some 5870's beat this good luck and great results tom 
I think someone that has the time to manage its should star a thread with a consistant res/aa/af so this becomes easy anyone oblige?
I think someone that has the time to manage its should star a thread with a consistant res/aa/af so this becomes easy anyone oblige?
Last edited:
Thank you sir.
I'd love to run them at 1Ghz 24/7 but it's a bit of a faff on with MSI Afterburner. So I'm going with 900/1295 with CCC until I cba to either flash BIOS or properly setup profiles. It can be used 24/7 at 1Ghz if I wanted though, powerplay just has to be disabled, temps are fine
Not too far off a 5970
1Ghz 5770's
1920x1200
Ultra Enhanced - DX11
1920 x 1200, Ultra Settings, DX11.
Associate
- Joined
- 5 Jan 2007
- Posts
- 546
nice results
Hello there
I got my 5770 today so i am posting screenshots of before with my 4850 and after with the Asus 5770
Nice improvement for just a graphics card upgrade. What i did find strange is how triple buffering on in CCC affected my score. It also looked jerky with tearing
Nice litle card, money well spent and a screen shot of DX11 with tesse on, couldnt do a proper test due to resolution
I was bored so i let CCC overclock it,dropped memory back to 1200 and GPU to 1000 amd got a nice boost
I got my 5770 today so i am posting screenshots of before with my 4850 and after with the Asus 5770
Nice improvement for just a graphics card upgrade. What i did find strange is how triple buffering on in CCC affected my score. It also looked jerky with tearing
Nice litle card, money well spent and a screen shot of DX11 with tesse on, couldnt do a proper test due to resolution
I was bored so i let CCC overclock it,dropped memory back to 1200 and GPU to 1000 amd got a nice boost
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 13 Nov 2007
- Posts
- 1,483
Testing out the 5970 ...:
Was hoping someone would post up using a 5770 UltraDad. I'm gonna be upgrading from a 256mb x1900xt, so am hoping to see hell of an improvement in peformance!
Hello there
Glad i could help out with some screen shots borgia
. I am very pleased with the performance increase, i think you will see a massive difference from a x1900xt 
Best thing is how silent it is, been playing a few games since i had it, Dragon Age Origins, Stalker, Torchlight and Fallout 3 and if has not got hotter than 50c with a fan speed of 32 on auto
Rated Benchmark - Dx10 1680x1050 High: Min / Avg / Max (FPS)
Day 46.29 / 82.64 / 132.38
Night 30.89 / 53.96 / 103.10
Rain 30.91 / 53.89 / 139.89
Sunshafts 38.68 / 65.55 / 99.52
Your benchmark score totals 6401 points.
Disappointed with that score but benchmark looked smooth; the top marks in the official Stalker site was 52000, with mine miles behind. I didn't think my 4870 512MB CF would suffer that much
Day 46.29 / 82.64 / 132.38
Night 30.89 / 53.96 / 103.10
Rain 30.91 / 53.89 / 139.89
Sunshafts 38.68 / 65.55 / 99.52
Your benchmark score totals 6401 points.
Disappointed with that score but benchmark looked smooth; the top marks in the official Stalker site was 52000, with mine miles behind. I didn't think my 4870 512MB CF would suffer that much
Disappointed with that score but benchmark looked smooth; the top marks in the official Stalker site was 52000, with mine miles behind. I didn't think my 4870 512MB CF would suffer that much
Ignore those highest scores on the official - they have amended the config files to get those scores
Two of my top cores there are real teh other is haxxxxozzed
Last edited:
Ignore those highest scores on the official - they have amended the config files to get those scores
Two of my top cores there are real teh other is haxxxxozzed
I think know what you mean - I seen the files in BenchCfg and tried it out but used only the rspec_minimum settings and got 14588 (from my non-hacked 6401 points) DX10 High mode (I wish this was my first score to settle my mind!). Pointless posting the FPS/image but will try upping the score by legit overclocking later.
Silly how they have made it so easy to fake & make people like me worry I have a below-average PC. It looks good for hardware vendors if people did buy new components but it looks fine to me in this brief bencmark. The real test is in the demo via using Fraps to see if your PC can play this game well enough to help you decide to buy it or not, not this benchmark.
Last edited: