No dm I gave an opinion based on actual events. Pulis has shown as little as 4-5 months ago that he doesn't like working at clubs without full control. WBA don't give their managers that.
You on the other hand initially based your opinion on the fact that he just wants the money - which is contradicted by the fact he walked out of Palace just 5 months ago and now making random guesses as what might have changed. He might have decided he wants to dress as a woman too, it's possible.
Again no, you are specifically talking about two different things, control of who is signed is entirely separate from a manager getting more funds for transfers HE picks.
As for basing my opinion on the fact he wants money, once again, I haven't stated this as fact or opinion, it is NOT my opinion AND it isn't contradicted by the fact he "walked out of". He walked out of a job that he was being paid for and is only allowed to take a new job from 1st Jan....
At the time it was looking pretty mutual and his leaving compensation package being talked about in the press pretty much confirms that. So once again you aren't really basing things on actual events, just your entirely distorted version of events. He walked over principles about transfer control and who the club signs in your opinion, you've stated it multiple times.
In reality he was begging for more money like he did at Stoke, but like at Stoke(eventually) the owner stopped wanting to plough his own money into the club and there was what the club could afford left, Pulis is a man who likes to spend a fair amount and his insistence on more cash than is available has caused him to lose/leave two jobs. No one at Stoke nor Palace insisted he take players he didn't want(as you suggest) but simply refused his begging for more funds. Walking... seconds before you're fired for being a ****, it's really walking away.
I was again, that you seem to keep missing, pointing out the MANY reasons people consistently take jobs that aren't perfect, while you are stating as a categorical fact that he would never take such a job based off.... nothing. Money was a potential reason for taking a job(a huge one), I never claimed it was the reason he would definitely take said job. I've also pointed out basically the biggest name in management who was unhappy not having control at one club and happily signed for a club at a later date he'd have almost no control of, you've ignored this example multiple times.
