Ahhh, good point raised. I bought a 64GB Sammy SSD, which is supposedly the PB22-J, just looked and it's actually an MMCRE64G5MPP-0VA, which, upon googling, suggests it is also 90MB/s read. But, running it through HD Tune gives me an average of about 160MB/s (lowest being 80, highest being 200). Which, although higher than 90MB/s, is still slower than I was expecting, and isn't what the PB22-J is meant to do. I know figures get manipulated and biased, but even my maximum speed isn't hitting 220.
Double? 23% more, roughly, for 128gb and 15% more for 256gb. Plus a more consumer-focussed company, also offering firmware updates..
Yes the 64gb ones were good value when they were cheap. Now there's more competition.
though not perhaps faster than two 64GBs RAIDed

But sold one as I didn't really need the speed. Just got one now and it is still very snappy in Windows 7.
Unlike the vertexes the samsungs don't need updates they just work out of the box.
Not everyone buys everything from OCUK
I'm waiting for my two 128GBs elsewhere.Isn't the 64gb Samsung much slower than the 128 and 256 variants?
Yes.
For the 60GB model I'd go with the Vertex. But then I don't want a drive smaller than 120GB anyway....
lol- thinking about it, isn't the 60gb vertex slower than the 128gb variant as well?

In a word, no.![]()
Where are your figures from?
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=HD-014-OC&groupid=701&catid=14&subcat=910
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=HD-015-OC&groupid=701&catid=14&subcat=1427
200mb/s read 160mb/s write across the series. Although 120gb+ has 64mb cache, smaller only has 32mb
What is the cache size on my xxGB Vertex drive?
64MB for all Vertex SSD's (do you doubt Tony??? )