Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Still rocking my 2500k with a 1070 on an x34a monitor.
I'm sure there would be an improvement going to ryzen for instance but I'm not sure it's worth it for me personally. I don't sit there benching or looking at frame counts. Not going to lie though I would quite like the new shiny shiny just for the sake of it![]()
The vast majority will be on 768p or 1080p at 60 Hz. Imagine all of the laptop users for a start, then every casual gamer who doesn't even know monitors with >60 Hz refresh rates exist. I bet 1440p and 2160p are more common than 100+ Hz.Anyone on 4K?
Pity Steam survey doesn't capture monitor hz. I wonder just how many are still on peasant rez + 60.
I wonder just how many are still on peasant rez + 60.
None of you know what you are missing!
Seriously i would go >100hz over 4k anyday
I would agree , BUT.. i couldn't live with 1080p again regardless of the hz, but i've been running 1440p for 4 years now and for the last year 1440p 144hz. 1440p @ 60hz just feels slow and laggy now. Saying that anything over about 75hz and i dont really notice the difference. I certainly dont notice the difference in refresh between my old 144hz 1440p and my new 100hz Pg348q.
by the time you have spent money on this it would have been better to sell your mobo/cpu/ram and get a second hand 6700k setup, my cpu was £200, 70 for a mobo and what ever ram was
Do you want to have another go at that sentence?I bet your at hoot at parties.....
Do you want to have another go at that sentence?