What do you mean?
[TW]Fox;19956426 said:You mean like how seperating the railways from the state acheived a level of non-interference and got a better deal for the taxpayer?
Exactly.[TW]Fox;19956426 said:You mean like how seperating the railways from the state acheived a level of non-interference and got a better deal for the taxpayer?
We could, the big problem is that the NHS (like most of the public sector) gets used as a political football. We should be focusing on what is best for patients, not what suits politically, which ironically means that we need to seperate the provision of care from the state in order to achieve that level of non-interference.
So in other words to stop politically motivated exploitation of the NHS you should privatise it? Based on nothing more than political motivation?
If I go private, I can get alternative opinions, changing providers etc actually makes a difference, whatever level we go to.
Within the NHS, I can change in theory, but in practice, you're still under the same PCT, subject to the same inane rules and pointless petty bureaucracy, and you can never actually escape the system. You can simply try and talk to a slightly different part of it and hope for a different result.
Average based on what? I believe the quoted figure earlier in the thread was 18th in the world? That's a world with over 180 countries. I'd say that's very definitely 'above average'.
What is your experience of poor service from the NHS?
I've covered it elsewhere on the forums, don't really want to go into it again, but it involves continuous failures to treat people I care about until they have suffered unnecessary permanent damage among other things.
Fair enough.
That is one example though, it doesn't mean it is indicative.
It isn't one example, it's several, in several different areas of the country.
No, based on the idea that a system controlled by politicans can never be freed from politics.
Hang on, you pulled up two serving Police Officers for talking about their experiences of their job, yet you cite "experiences" as some sort of indication of what you experienced being the norm!
And a system controlled by corporations can never be freed from competition. The difference between politics and competition is that one of them could, potentially, lead to a better service.
Actually, you asked what my experience was. At no point have I suggested that my experience is grounds for change.
For evidence of poor standards within the NHS, I much prefer looking at patient outcome data, which do just happen to tie in along the same lines as my experiences.
And we all know have statistics can be manipulated.