Say hello to the new moderating team

Mikol said:
You stayed up / got up early just for this?

Hmmmm, Zip, I never wanted to say this to you, but... get a life!


:p

Nah, I didnt stay up just for this. I just have a really messed up sleeping pattern at the moment and this just happend to be happening while i was awake.

I got to see a really cool sunrise though :cool:
 
wyrdo said:
Pebbles voiced her opinion, I didn't actually notice any rule breaking yet she is now suspended, why is that?

Are we going to see the same kind of farce that happened in the console forum?
Farce? Cool off for a while.

(this is more like it) :D
 
Spie said:
Farce? Cool off for a while.

(this is more like it) :D

:eek: :D Yewen does a good job and can hold a respectable conversation with regards to religion on MSN... should I feel inclined to instigate one.
 
starscream said:
I haven't been a student for 6 years.

Tsk...didnt you realise that its easier to debate with people if you apply spurious labels to them?

For example:

Person A: I beleive XYZ.
Person B: Yeah, well thats because you're a student.

Whether person A is a student or not, person B has proven that XYZ is wrong. FACT.
 
wyrdo said:
Pebbles voiced her opinion, I didn't actually notice any rule breaking yet she is now suspended, why is that?

Are we going to see the same kind of farce that happened in the console forum?

What rule did wyrdo break to get suspended :confused:
 
Yewen said:
I have been moderating SC for a few months now, I took it on after Case Central and before Members Market. Been moderating the section impartially ever since. :)

I will never get myself part of a debate and due to not really having an interest in current world issues to the level of the average SC poster my lack of an opinion means I can quite easily take out the personal attacks. My style of moderating in there is to remove the posts without a trace to let the debate carry on flowing naturally, also pick up the RTM posts. :)

I haven't looked in there in ages hence can't offer an opinion on your capabilities.
 
Visage said:
Tsk...didnt you realise that its easier to debate with people if you apply spurious labels to them?

For example:

Person A: I beleive XYZ.
Person B: Yeah, well thats because you're a student.

Whether person A is a student or not, person B has proven that XYZ is wrong. FACT.

You pay no heed to the relationship of ego and identity in forming opinion. Also, membership of certain ideologies require that a person hold a certain opinion - and if a person describes themselves as XYZ and also acknolwedge that all XYZs believe must believe this then they are hypocrites if they do not also believe this
 
6 pages and only 2 suspensions! you guy's aren’t as hardcore as us Console Forum Guy's there would have been permabans and suspensions as far as the eye can see by now :D
 
Gilly said:
You might not have noticed rulebreaking but really its not any of your concern.
Either a rule was broken, if so can you clarify which it was so i don't end up breaking it myself in future due to not understanding it.
Or a rule that isn't in the faq was broken, in which case it should be in the faq. Or a rule wasn't broken. If its either of the last two that's a concern. I don't want to sound confrontational and cause trouble, i'm merely confused. Its not my job to judge what's breaking a rule and what isn't, but its important to know what constitutes breaking a rule so i don't break it myself.
 
Back
Top Bottom