Scam or world changing technology?

Radiation said:
Why hasn't anyone came up with a new kind of propulsion to get us into space easier and cheaper?

You would think they would be working hard on this but all you see are old rocket engines that are just as wasteful and expensive as ever, they only seem to care about satellite engines which are efficient but useless at getting us into orbit, it's pretty pathetic really, it's 2012 and we haven't been back to the moon or invented anything new to get us into space. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Have you researched at all? There are plenty of new ideas coming out/being tested. Its not.exactly easy stuff considering the technical problems. Google SABRE engine.
 
StriderX said:
To dismiss everything that sounds nonsensical is nonsensical.

I never dismiss anything completely, even useless information is useful at times. ;)
Click to expand...

You apply basic physics and you don't pay or give them any money.

To go along with these scams is nonsical. You can do it without giving support or money. That's why scams work because of such attitudes, I'll just go along with it and see. No, if they have what they have build a device, get it patented and send it to me. Show me how it works bla, bla, bla

Seeing as they can't get basic physics right in the op, then it's a scam pure and simple and isn't in the least bit nonseical to dismiss it as such.
 
Last edited:
Glaucus said:
You apply basic physics and you don't pay or give them any money.

To go along with these scams is nonsical. You can do it without giving support or money. That's why scams work because of such attitudes, I'll just go along with it and see. No, if they have what they have build a device, get it patented and send it to me. Show me how it works bla, bla, bla

Seeing as they can't get basic physics right in the op, then it's a scam pure and simple and isn't in the least bit nonseical to dismiss it as such.
Click to expand...

You seem to be misunderstanding me.

Just because I don't deny they have any sort of worth, doesn't mean I support them.

Plus the main page of the site was all I needed to know it wasn't worth much of my time anyway, misspellings everywhere, highlighting, bolded words...not one physics/science general site uses them in such a childish manner.
 
Glaucus said:
You apply basic physics and you don't pay or give them any money.

To go along with these scams is nonsical. You can do it without giving support or money. That's why scams work because of such attitudes, I'll just go along with it and see. No, if they have what they have build a device, get it patented and send it to me. Show me how it works bla, bla, bla
Click to expand...

What you are suggesting is pretty much what they've done, it seems:

"European and international patents for the technology were applied for in early October 2005 for all aspects of possible use of the new technology, covering some hundreds of applications."

"In September 2004 he was invited by a leading western country, through its government office organizations, to present his technology for evaluation.

From November 2004 to March 2005 his technology was under consideration by scientists at a university.

In March 2005, the report from the university declared that energy production through this new technology is feasible."




Sept 21st they intend to release the tech' to all nations so I suppose we'll have to wait and see.
 
Last edited:
It is quite clearly the workings of an Alien race, who have set up this foundation as a means of 'offering' us this amazing new advanced technology. While our governaments are getting to grips with this marvelous gift to humanity THEY will be getting ready to rape our resources and/or prepare us for mass probing and harvesting.

or it's a scam :D
 
The really point is, if you have a massive breakthrough - why veil it in such secrecy?, why not give tangible examples & open up the research to the scrutiny of the scientific community.

Real evidence which has been independently verified won't be ignored.
 
elmarko1234 said:
The really point is, if you have a massive breakthrough - why veil it in such secrecy?, why not give tangible examples & open up the research to the scrutiny of the scientific community.

Real evidence which has been independently verified won't be ignored.
Click to expand...

just sent the link to a mate of mine who is a science nerd. says a new of the things being used are pretty big thinking. possibly **** but maybe not. he seems to be incorporating a few of the 'next big things' together, which is what my mate is working on. he is determined we are close to some really radical breakthroughs

edit: elmarko1234 - sometimes you cant hint at things as it gives the whole game away. this of course could be complete BS but if its not and is radical, best way is to show everyone rather than let some have a head start.
 
Last edited:
realBabelfish said:
just sent the link to a mate of mine who is a science nerd. says a new of the things being used are pretty big thinking. possibly **** but maybe not. he seems to be incorporating a few of the 'next big things' together, which is what my mate is working on. he is determined we are close to some really radical breakthroughs
Click to expand...
Yeah, I'll be happy to eat my hat if I'm wrong.

But every single fibre in my body is screaming "It's a SCAM!", too many "major breakthroughs" have been hinted in the last 20 years (none of which have come to fruition).

Science doesn't tend to work in breakthroughs any-more (as the easy stuff has been solved) now it seems to be a very slow evolution of existing ideas with a few minor leaps - but nothing too extreme.

I'll speak to my brother to see what he thinks tonight (PHD in theoretical physics with applied mathematics) - his theses was on magnetics/electronics/conductors so he should be able to give me an informed opinion (I'd wager it's rubbish).

But hey, don't get me wrong - I'd love to be proved wrong.

http://www.keshefoundation.org/en/m...tured-by-iranian-flying-saucer-pesncom-part-i

Part I: Was US Spy Drone Captured by Iranian Flying Saucer? (something else from that website...) - doesn't exactly fill me with confidence.
 
Last edited:
realBabelfish said:
you dont believe it works? have you seen the videos? or the rodan coil stuff?
Click to expand...

Do I believe a perpetual motion machine work, eerrrmmmm no, no I don't.

First it's Rodin coil and it's a load of bs have you read what he says on it, it doesn't work either and where is it in all our mobile phones, where all the results rom the 2006 tests. You have been suckered.
 
Last edited:
nano tech and growing diamonds yes... they don't affect physics of mavity!
travelling so fast that the next step will be teleportation is so far beyond our current technology that you might as well ring up spoc and ask him to give you a hand.
 
realBabelfish said:
agreed. didnt he invent a perpetual motion machine years ago using magnetic flux? its only now people are looking at them again and realising they work.
Click to expand...

For a perpetual motion machine to work you'd need to get out more energy than you put in. Anyone who thinks this might be possible understands nothing about physics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom