Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Apr 2011
- Posts
- 3,881
- Location
- Nottingham
This is all.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
This is all.
BF3 on full ultra with 2xAA gets 70+ FPS and crysis never drops below the v-sync. How is that not bang for buck?

I really dont get all the noise about these 2500K's - why would you want a chip without HT? Day-to-day basically makes the PC slow as ****... Ok you may get a few more FPS when in game but so what... by the time the map has loaded half the match is over!
And getting into windows takes FOREVER, almost physically painful. I hated and regretted every second i owned that aweful i5 750 - i should have bought the 760 with HT...
But that is last gen... So the option now is simular - cant have a 2500K because of no HT so the other option is a 2600K or 2700K but they are 250+ quid. Even the intel fanboys must concede that is pretty steap?!
So what is the final option.... AMD. CPU, Mobo & Ram for the price of a sandybridge - BF3 on full ultra with 2xAA gets 70+ FPS and crysis never drops below the v-sync. How is that not bang for buck?
I appriciate people use PC's for different things but i just couldnt bring myself to spend my hard earnt cash on something i be ultimately dissapointed with...
Ok, just saying, flame away....![]()
IAnd getting into windows takes FOREVER, almost physically painful.
This is all.
This is all.