Shark Attack - your thoughts?

Glaucus · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:11

We have waterproofing for a limited time. We are adapted to be multifunctioning in pretty much all environments.

Glaucus · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:11

asim18 said:
What?

You said a new born baby could naturally swim.

I said it's not swimming, it just a survival reflex.

"And?"?

Naturally as in instinctively. If that's not a reflex what is it? What's your problem with that?

Jimz · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:13

I Feel NOTHING for the diver which was killed. The Shark did nothing wrong. The Diver was in Water and was around a Shark, what the hell was he expecting would happen.

It REALLY does my head in when people take the person that died side rather than the Animal. 99% of the time all the Animal is doing in Protecting itself, yet it gets blamed and people have to kill it.

so annoying

asim18 · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:14

AcidHell2 said:
If that's not a reflex what is it?

That's exactly what I said it IS. A reflex.

A human baby's survival reflex in water is not the same as a fish swimming naturally, doing what it's born to do.

i-bert · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:15

Nexus said:
I think the comment about birds already won this silly argument.

But the birds don't whine about it when one gets eaten by a shark.

trigger-happy · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:15

they need to research more where the sharks are normally found and implement a no swimming rule in that area or you just fart in the water which will just keep em away away for awhile

Glaucus · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:16

asim18 said:
That's exactly what I said it IS. A reflex.

A human baby's survival reflex in water is not the same as a fish swimming naturally, doing what it's born to do.

Which is the AND bit. You differentiated between them I didn't. You took something I said as something different.

Glaucus · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:18

Nvidiot said:
You don't find more normal birds such as Robins/Blackbirds/Blue-**** hunting in the water, evolution has designed certain families of the species to do the job required.

which proves the side that water is our natural habitat. We can survive perfectly well in it to hunt. Just like many many other species. We can swim and survive in water perfectly fine. Unlike some other creatures.

asim18 · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:18

AcidHell2 said:
Which is the AND bit. You differentiated between them I didn't. You took something I said as something different.

What?

You said "Babies swim without practice, of course it's natural".

I'm saying it isn't natural and babies do not swim. Kicking its legs in survival desperation is not swimming, It's drowning.

doofer · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:20

AcidHell2 said:
which proves the side that water is our natural habitat.

I guess if you're Pond Life.

asim18 · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:20

Double post. Delete.

RetiredGreyFox · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:21

AcidHell2 said:
What is a crocodiles natural habitat? Water, land? It can't breath under water. But water is certainly part of its natural territory.

Ooh, good question

Glaucus · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:21

asim18 said:
What?

You said "Babies swim without practice, of course it's natural".

I'm saying it isn't natural and babies do not swim. Kicking its legs in survival desperation is not swimming, It's drowning.

Actually all I said was
baby's swim with no practice.
Which is a reflex. Just like other creatures do stuff from reflex to survive as well.

Glaucus · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:22

doofer said:
I guess if you're Pond Life.

Great argument, will read again.
Why not respond to the question presented.

Nexus · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:23

The baby argument is also silly because at the end of the day, a baby will die without teaching and parentage. Regardless of the environment it is in, a baby will die with no support.

Glaucus · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:24

Nexus said:
The baby argument is also silly because at the end of the day, a baby will die without teaching and parentage. Regardless of the environment it is in, a baby will die with no support.

Very true.

Nvidiot · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:24

AcidHell2 said:
which proves the side that water is our natural habitat. We can survive perfectly well in it to hunt. Just like many many other species. We can swim and survive in water perfectly fine. Unlike some other creatures.

It doesn't, if you dont have the energy to tread water then you drown.

If you dont know how to swim, then you drown.

Hypothetical theorie,

If a duck cant swim, it still wont drown as its adapted to float on the surface all day every day, its both light enough and waterproof enough by design to float.

asim18 · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:25

AcidHell2 said:
Actually all I said was
baby's swim with no practice.
Which is a reflex. Just like other creatures do stuff from reflex to survive as well.

You're don't even know what you typed 5 mins ago?

AcidHell2 said:
baby's swim with no practice.
Of course it's natural,

I'm outta here lmao.

Glaucus · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:25

A duck isn't the only bird that hunts in water.

If we run out of energy we can't hunt or gather food we die. Therefore land isn't are natural territory. Please really, your going to start such useless comparisons.

Glaucus · 23 Oct 2011 at 18:26

asim18 said:
You're don't even know what you typed 5 mins ago?

I'm outta here lmao.

Miss quote.
Full stop and Separate line, now what does the rest of that line say. Oh wait yes that's right. The natural bit is about something totally different.

I know I'm usually rubbish at grammar but it's very much included in that quote.