Some prefer uncomfortable truths over blissful ignorance.
I don't think this has anything to do with either
that the attack happened isn't an uncomfortable truth and advocating not giving it too much publicity isn't advocating ignorance
Some prefer uncomfortable truths over blissful ignorance.
Thats fine if you then apply it to all white sumpremists, animal rights, anti abortion nutters who kill more Americans every year than islamic terrorists
Thats fine if you then apply it to all white sumpremists, animal rights, anti abortion nutters who kill more Americans every year than islamic terrorists
Isnt this thread about an Islamic Terrorist?
Yes but if you are going to offer solutions applying to just them, shouldnt it also apply to other terrorists? Or do we just put out head in the sand and ignore them?
Different problems have different causes, demographics and solutions. To apply blanket solutions would be stupid.
Again, i am not debating that anymore with you or anyone, this is the third time you have brought that up.Yes but if you are going to offer solutions applying to just them, shouldnt it also apply to other terrorists? Or do we just put out head in the sand and ignore them?
Different problems have different causes, demographics and solutions. To apply blanket solutions would be stupid.
Why? A terrorist is a terrorist surely? Why not apply the " anyone spouting any extremist material that is designed to cause harm\death\destruction in this country in public or online then an instant full 2 year stretch inside, do it 3 times and you are away for 20 years." to all extremist terrorists?
I'm reminded of the Charlie Brooker piece (there's a forensic psychologist near the end saying about what should and shouldn't be reported). It's in the context of school shootings etc, but I'd wager similar applies to coverage of terrorist incidents,
Again, i am not debating that anymore with you or anyone, this is the third time you have brought that up.
This thread is about an Islamic Terrorist, so as from now my posts will be on that subject only.
Go and argue the toss elsewhere if you want to ramble on about other types of terrorism.
You are another handwringer, deflect, deflect, deflect.
Rightwing extremist terrorism seems pretty universal, and most of the solutions seem to be suitable to tackle all forms.
A terrorist is not just a terrorist. You're showing your ignorance there.
Look at the way the IRA carried out their attacks compared to the Islamic sects. Look at the likes of the Unabomber. Very different methodologies. Very different motives. Very different solutions.
Thank you for the name calling, i never called you any names.
Greebo said:Blah,
Glad we got that sorted and got to the bottom of your racist agenda then.
Different methods granted. But the same result. So why cant the propsoed rules about locking up "anyone spouting any extremist material that is designed to cause harm\death\destruction in this country in public or online then an instant full 2 year stretch inside, do it 3 times and you are away for 20 years" apply to the IRA for example?
Oh really, you called me a racist earlier in the thread, here you go,
Because they didn't do that. Heck, it was incredibly difficult to prove someone was a member.
So are you saying it's easy to identify people who have been deluded into believing that they will wake up in heaven with 70 virgins for killing a cop or other innocent people?