Side hustles?

The thing is a LOT of the girls that prostitute themselves on OF seem to think that it won't affect there later life or in many cases the lives of their currently infant kids. There are MANY former OF girls that already regret the decision.

Good point. But it's tangential to the issue of whether or not engaging in (legal) paid sex-industry work is an ethical choice of occupation. A woman/man who posts their topless/naked pics on the internet for free (swingers forums etc) and is subsequently recognised and reposted elsewhere by someone could have the same problems in later life as these OF content producers.

There was a recent one on a podcast. She'd done OF to help pay for the last year or so of law school. She passed all of her exams and gained her degree. She currently works in a supermarket because no law firm will employ her due to the OF history.

She really should have seen that one coming! Law firms are notorious for being very conservative and have clauses in their employment contracts prohibiting their employees from doing anything that might damage their reputations. Many multinationals and big corporations in non-legal fields also have similar clauses.

Even if she had disguised her face to prevent anyone from recognising her from her OF pics she could still have been fired after becoming a para-legal simply for having once possessed an OF sellers account and posting her personal pics on it.

Other regret stories include their kid getting mercifully bullied because regardless of the OF paywall images of mum spaffing her clunge for £3.99 made it to the playground.

I do find it strange that people posting those sort of pics (who plan to have a normal family/personal life afterwards) don't take some steps to at least disguise their faces. Just wearing a masquerade mask and a wig would make it virtually impossible for someone who is not very close to them to recognise them in such pics.

It's also worth mentioning that Onlyfans wasn't originally a prostitution ring. It was setup as a Twitch/Patreon rolled into one platform. The creators even tried to ban 18+ content and were overruled by their investors/shareholder who saw £££.

Only Fans is just the most recent and well known of many internet platforms which offer a marketplace for this sort of amateur-produced pornography. There's nothing unique about it, the monetisation of home-made porn has been going on since the internet became popular in the late 1990s.

This is the issue. Most of them don't. They live in this idiotic bubble thought that it all stays contained within OF and once they stop it disappears into the ether.

Obviously when that bubble bursts it's 'woe is me' or 'everyone's wrong' attitudes. No personal reflection on their own actions & when it's pointed out the feminists and white knights scream 'victim blaming'

Yes, anyone who works in the sex industry (and is identifiable by members of the public) should be very aware that some professions/walks-of-life are going to be closed to them thereafter. Unfortunately, some people just don't think it through though.

For example, I recently read about a Dominatrix in New Jersey who made many very severe (up to ABH/GBH level) BDSM videos with men (which were sold widely internationally) and who many years later successfully became a Police Officer only to get fired a few months afterwards when she was recognised by one of her male porn-surfing colleagues!
 
It wasn't even that long ago:


That was because of banks/payment providers though, not because the founder & main owner really wanted to. (Both of them set up adult entertainment businesses in the past an OF was intended to provide that stuff even if they wanted to diversify a bit).
 
Good point. But it's tangential to the issue of whether or not engaging in (legal) paid sex-industry work is an ethical choice of occupation. A woman/man who posts their topless/naked pics on the internet for free (swingers forums etc) and is subsequently recognised and reposted elsewhere by someone could have the same problems in later life as these OF content producers.



She really should have seen that one coming! Law firms are notorious for being very conservative and have clauses in their employment contracts prohibiting their employees from doing anything that might damage their reputations. Many multinationals and big corporations in non-legal fields also have similar clauses.

Even if she had disguised her face to prevent anyone from recognising her from her OF pics she could still have been fired after becoming a para-legal simply for having once possessed an OF sellers account and posting her personal pics on it.



I do find it strange that people posting those sort of pics (who plan to have a normal family/personal life afterwards) don't take some steps to at least disguise their faces. Just wearing a masquerade mask and a wig would make it virtually impossible for someone who is not very close to them to recognise them in such pics.



Only Fans is just the most recent and well known of many internet platforms which offer a marketplace for this sort of amateur-produced pornography. There's nothing unique about it, the monetisation of home-made porn has been going on since the internet became popular in the late 1990s.



Yes, anyone who works in the sex industry (and is identifiable by members of the public) should be very aware that some professions/walks-of-life are going to be closed to them thereafter. Unfortunately, some people just don't think it through though.

For example, I recently read about a Dominatrix in New Jersey who made many very severe (up to ABH/GBH level) BDSM videos with men (which were sold widely internationally) and who many years later successfully became a Police Officer only to get fired a few months afterwards when she was recognised by one of her male porn-surfing colleagues!
I would love to see how that conversation went 'down'. I was just browsing porn and I recognised your face :D .
 
I would love to see how that conversation went 'down'. I was just browsing porn and I recognised your face :D .

Yes, the New York Post reported on her case and it gets worse. According to a quick Google search of her Dominatrix name she was known for her videos of a particular type of S&M which, shall we just say, has a very negative effect on a man's ability to reproduce! Therefore, whoever recognised her must have had an extreme taste in porn. LOL
 
Yes, the New York Post reported on her case and it gets worse. According to a quick Google search of her Dominatrix name she was known for her videos of a particular type of S&M which, shall we just say, has a very negative effect on a man's ability to reproduce! Therefore, whoever recognised her must have had an extreme taste in porn. LOL
Almost embarrassing for the guy that found it :cry:.
 
Back
Top Bottom