Silva V Mata V Cazorla

With how things are I'd say Mata, but put Cazorla in Chelsea or Man City's team, I think the outcome could be very, very different.
 
With how things are I'd say Mata, but put Cazorla in Chelsea or Man City's team, I think the outcome could be very, very different.

Nah dont see it myself, Chelsea aren't exactly great and Mata has almost single handily won them countless games this season (he was a hell of a lot more effective than Silva last season as well), I dont see that match winning ability in Cazorla
 
Back to the topic. Silva when hes on form for me but that's not the case. So it will have to be Mata.
Cazorla is great but he hasn't been that consistent this season. Didn't watch him that much at Malaga so I can't say. Also there are a few abilities that Cazorla lacks.

Oh and OP don't post the whoscored image. Those are just meaningless stats.
 
Difficult to choose between Mata and Silva... definitely not Cazorla though.

If I had to make a choice it would be Mata I think.
 
Probably Mata although it would depend a bit on the overall makeup of the team.

One thing about Cazorla is that he embarrasses other footballers by being so two-footed, although that isn't the be-all and end-all. It makes him great to watch because he can move the ball in the most efficient way without having to worry about moving it onto his stronger foot, it's kinda weird but after watching him for a while other players' play starts looking ugly by comparison (although that's not to say ugly play can't be more effective).

I will be chaining my first born son to a chair leg when kicking a football, alternate legs on alternate days, on Sunday he can have the freedom of both legs
 
Mata, as yet, though he has plenty of games he's poor. There's a reason all three are in the EPL and not at Real or Barca. Silva is inconsistent and frequently poor against bigger teams, can't impose himself on a game where a Fabregas/Xavi shine in games like that. Mata is far less inconsistent than Silva and seemingly more effective but he also takes a lot of freekicks for a top team. I think he got probably two assists against Arsenal, but was actually mostly poor throughout the game, him, Hazard and Oscar gave the ball away constantly in that game, were rarely threatening in open play and two good dead ball deliveries isn't exactly a great performance.

Santi.... difficult to know, he's only had 2-3 really really good games for Arsenal, against Reading and Southampton, and he had 2 months being pretty ineffective inbetween which isn't exactly great. But he's in a new team and the rest of the team is struggling, at this stage impossible to know if its him, or the team, or both. Podolski/Santi look instantly hugely better when they aren't playing with Gervinho, or Santos, or Diaby, etc, etc.

Currently Mata>Silva>Santi.... Silva won't ever be better than Mata, too inconsistent and too crap against better opposition, Santi could end up anywhere in that list.
 
Back
Top Bottom