Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,339
- Location
- Planet Earth
DX12 won't be a factor for at least 2 years. It takes ages for a new API to get momentum. DX10 had a total of like 1 game before DX11 rolled around.
I think DX12 will start to see quicker adoption TBF,especially since there is even a push from Intel for it,primarily to reduce power consumption.
I can only see Skylake being maybe of some incremental use in certain MMOs still running on old lightly threaded engines and perhaps some RTS games.
The thing is just like with Broadwell,Intel is targeting low power areas like laptops and SFF PCs,more than out and out performance. Even Zen,is going to be probably more of the same. This is why we are getting insane laptops like this:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9401/the-msi-gt80-titan-review
All the process nodes are now going towards density and power saving more than massive clockspeeds,which is not so good for desktop versions.
Despite all the hype with Haswell being the next big thing and then Broadwell on this very forum for desktop,I don't really think its going to be worth anyone upgrading from a more recent Core i7 CPU to it,especially with things like higher res monitors,VR and so on,we are primarily still bottlenecked by the power of graphics cards.
Anybody with recent Core i7s are going to be fine.
Also,the main IPC uplift was the previous generations to SB. What SB bought was far greater clockspeeds at stock and when overclocked,plus much lower power consumption too and much less cooling requirements.
32NM was probably the last process node Intel made especially with a desktop orientation. 22NM,14NM and 10NM are more orientated towards power saving,and its even more apparent with TSMC and GF now. This is why I suspect Zen might be more limited by clockspeeds and will need that IPC increase to compensate.
Last edited: