1200 wud put me up higher in the 3DMark11 bench thread too and probly hitting that P10000![]()
Its a 275mhz increase from stock, i guess its even more from a 7950.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
1200 wud put me up higher in the 3DMark11 bench thread too and probly hitting that P10000![]()
Its a 275mhz increase from stock, i guess its even more from a 7950.
Mine is the 6+8 pin on the 7970 PCB @ 950MHz core.
I was hoping i had a good clocker but seems like it was the usual Lottery.
ASIC = 87.1
Default Voltage = 1.056


^^ almost identical to the stock 7970 lightning run, although he had high Res textures.
Would be interesting to see the performance hit if you can do a run with the high Res texture pack, and also if it increases vram usage considerably.
.Will do when my poxy internet fetches it.
Not surprising the 7970's are faster in this game but an overclocked 680 does give OK performance at least on max settings.
I didn't know if you're 680 run was stock or overclocked, I'm guessing its an over clocked run. Why are you not surprised the 7970's are faster? Because its an AMD gaming evolved game? I mean not including the 'intentionally gimped for nvidia AA'
Max OC mate.
Not surprising because Extreme AA is compute heavy of which the Kepler cards are lacking.
Yeah, that's what I was referring to by the gimped for nvidia AA. Wonder how the 7970 compares to the 680 with just high AA though?

Find me somebody's results and I'll match it to have a look![]()


Rusty can you confirm this please m8.
When playing this game my 2nd gpu stays idle???
Im using nvidia drivers 301.42.
Do both of your cards work???