Some of those results seem ridiculously sketchy.
Not really, Skyrim just favours high clock speed and/or IPC over number of cores...which shows just how bad Bulldozer is.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Some of those results seem ridiculously sketchy.
Not really, Skyrim just favours high clock speed and/or IPC over number of cores...which shows just how bad Bulldozer is.
You're obviously not looking properly.
And what makes matters worse is now i cant bring myself to buy a Sandybridge setup, because Ivy Bridge is now just a few months away, so all in all, i'll have delayed buying a new system for a year...
Wouldn't be the first time...anyways, leave me alone with my prejudices against this CPU...,for which i put off buying a Sandybridge for over 8mths, because i thought it would be a game changer...
A wasted 8mths....bitter and twisted?..not me..
EDIT:
And what makes matters worse is now i cant bring myself to buy a Sandybridge setup, because Ivy Bridge is now just a few months away, so all in all, i'll have delayed buying a new system for a year...
More proof, if any were needed, of what a complete POS Bulldozer is...
You have to be off your rocker to buy one of these turkeys for gaming....
Most of the games where you see such stark differences use the old Intel Compiler, you realise.
In such games or programs, there's simply no way for AMD to be competitive, even if technically their CPUs wiped the floor with Intel parts.
Most of the games where you see such stark differences use the old Intel Compiler, you realise.
In such games or programs, there's simply no way for AMD to be competitive, even if technically their CPUs wiped the floor with Intel parts.
More proof, if any were needed, of what a complete POS Bulldozer is...
You have to be off your rocker to buy one of these turkeys for gaming....
Not really the games engine is ancient and uses barely more than one core, and for some reason it's shadows tend to choke up a core too.
Not exactly "proof" of anything, you'd have to be off your rocker to think it did.
I'm not really interested in the Intel results as such, more the complete lack of improvement compared to the Phenom II range..
That upsets me FAR more than comparing to any Intel CPU's...that's the REAL failure of Bulldozer as far as I'm concerned.
Has anybody looked at bulldozer for an ESX Box? (Given bulldozer is effectively a server design which has been branded for consumers)
Would seem to me the quad bulldozer isn't a bad option against an i3 2120 at similar money. Workload will be almost entirely integer. Won't be playing games.
Phenom idle power is too high for my liking, I have nothing particularly against intel (I have a lynnfield running my desktop, an Atom running my firewall, a Core2 generation server, i3 laptop), just pondering what's best for my money
For those who have taken the plunge, I'm a little concerned around motherboards. AM3+ boards seem to predate the FX range, and some would seem to need a bios upgrade to make it work. Obvious problem being I don't intend to buy a seperate chip so I can upgrade it!
Lol did you take out a mortgage to buy it?
Lol did you take out a mortgage to buy it?
John
Some more results for you
Handbrake 0.9.5
Normal Preset
Container MKV
Priority high
2600K 4600Mhz
RAM 1600 9-9-9-24
Tron 51.616753 fps
Splice 35.502117 fps
Big 51.450516 fps
FX8150 4600Mhz
RAM 1600 9-9-9-24
Tron 48.685398 fps
Splice 34.118172 fps
Big 47.157837 fps
2500K 4600Mhz
RAM 1600 9-9-9-24
Tron 44.214649 fps
Splice 30.144783 fps
Big 45.051327 fps
I7 920 4000Mhz
RAM 1600 9-9-9-24
Tron 42.470345 fps
Splice 29.149643 fps
Big 42.311901 fps
edit: Added 2500K scores.
The 2500K is quite a bit slower than the 2600K at encoding, expected a little less, but was suprised to see it fall so far behind.
The 8150 sits right in between the 2 sandy variants.
The I7 920 put up a good show considering it's age and low clock speed, almost as quick as the 2500k running 600Mhz faster.
HT is showing it's worth in these tests.