No they didn't. They knew and they didn't want to admit it. The longer it went on for, the higher the consequences of putting their hands up but they knew. They will have known from early on. I work as a programmer and bad data and things like this do not fly under the radar for long.
Of course they would. Going up against a massive company like that with borderline unlimited money. The fact that the settlement from the post office was something like £58m and the actual victims got £12m and apparently the lawyers were doing them a favour is one of the most shocking things to me.
I'm sure all of this will come out over time but I imagine they were repeatedly told by the post office that their system has been checked and double checked and its perfect. They are also paid to do a job. That job was to prosecute.
Up to a point. One of the guys the post office hired to look into it ended up changing to the other side when he saw the truth that the post office were the villains in all of it.
The lawyers and courts clearly did trust the black and white.
How you’d run a trial in the circumstances as they were is not a question answered by the resources of the post office. The seeming difficulty must have been having to come up with a way of properly challenging the computer system in the face of what appears cut and dry evidence.
Really hope the truth does all come out. I can’t easily agree that theprosecuting lawyer at the magistrate’s court would have been complicit in a cover up though. Their job was to prosecute and the can only do so on the basis of what the evidence they are provided with. That evidence we know now was all tainted.
But the fact that someone in there knew that the information was dodgy and buried it is appalling.
People lost everything and some their lives over this. Truly hope that heads roll.