Caporegime
eg Over the last 13 years I know of 5 staff who have been found guilty of fraud (illegally filling in time sheets) but if all of a sudden we got 5 in a month and staff vehemently denying it we'd have to ask questions.
But that's not really what happened, is it? The PO introduced a new system that, among other things, was supposed to make things more fraud resistant. That it detected more fraud than before was surely expected, if not the scale of it. I suspect that many in the hierarchy believed that many of the lower downs had been quietly skimming for years and only just got caught.
Also, remember that while there were 900 cases, these were spread over 16 years, so around 50-60 cases/year.
Last edited: