A few scabby real bench runs for 30 mins is hardly cutting it...
But it does cut it and never crashs after on my usage which includes heavy VM loads. Been using RB for a few years now.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
SOME RYZEN 7 1700 OVERCLOCKING!
- Thread starter Gibbo
- Start date
But it does cut it and never crashs after on my usage which includes heavy VM loads. Been using RB for a few years now.
Man of Honour
Like I posted two days ago I've done around 4 hours of Encoding in Handbrake with x265 @ 4ghz 1.42v which given you want to know what Ryzen is capable of for the purpose of rendering video in Premier Pro I thought although not the 8 hours of Prime95 you was looking for, it was relevant information.
I've now done just short of 24 hours of encodes at 3.6ghz 1.21v
I appreciate you feel 8 hours of prime is indicative of stability, from my own experiences that isn't always the case so I like to test with work loads that my system does get used for
Then should have no reason or issue to run Aida64 for 8hrs then....
I dont think people have an issue with doing it, just unnecessary for most folk to do so when they have a stable system for their use and it is only to satisfy one or two persons on the internet (No offence).
Man of Honour
Dp
Deleted member 66701
D
Deleted member 66701
Then should have no reason or issue to run Aida64 for 8hrs then....
But I don't play Aida64 for 8 hrs - so why would I bother running it?
If I want to ensure my system is stable enough to get through a 3 hr encoding session, then I'll run a 3 hr encoding session. If it completes, then it's stable enough for a 3 hr encoding session.
If I want to ensure my system is stable when playing games, then I'll play some games.
Soldato
A windows crash is data-corruption-deluxe , they're not really two separate things
I dont think people have an issue with doing it, just unnecessary for most folk to do so when they have a stable system for their use and it is only to satisfy one or two persons on the internet (No offence).
Its not that at all...
People are getting defensive as they know or don't want to know whether they can pass that bench...
Don't run the test...Fine...But also don't moan about being asked to either....Just ignore the request and move on...
Then don't run it...No need to post why on the internet....Just ignore the request and move on
I don't play 3D Mark when clocking my GPU either...but I test it running many different benchies...
Last edited:
I don't think that people get defensive because of it passing, maybe more they think it is unnecessary and CBA to run a test for such a long time.
Soldato
I'm starting to wonder how well the IHS is solderd to the chip because when I'm stress testing ryzen master it's telling me my chip is at 60c but the heat pipes on my noctura are cool to the touch
Soldato
That old chestnut...I don't have the time...I'd start the run...go to work then return home...
Leave it running overnight? Not practical if your pc is in your bedroom though...
No effort other than clicking the start test button
Soldato
Well the temp reporting is well out then considering the heat pipes are very very cool to the touch
Maybe just not seated correctly? But you're probably correct that temp recording isn't fully accurate yet.
Soldato
As far as I can see it's seated right tightend fully and giving a good spead on the TIM
Associate
Well this is as far as l am willing to take this on my MSI Tomahawk, R7 1700 with a Ben Nevis cooler:
Black screens at 4.0 with 1.35 and 1.4, not keen to go to 1.45 with this cooler. and the extra 100Mhz would prob need a nice 240 AIO.
Black screens at 4.0 with 1.35 and 1.4, not keen to go to 1.45 with this cooler. and the extra 100Mhz would prob need a nice 240 AIO.
Last edited:
Well this is as far as l am willing to take this on my MSI Tomahawk, R7 1700 with a Ben Nevis cooler:
Black screens at 4.0 with 1.35 and 1.4, not keen to go to 1.45 with this cooler. and the extra 100Mhz would prob need a nice 240 AIO.
I've not seen any lengthy tests for Ryzen at 4ghz yet...
Looks like maybe 1.45 vcore is needed and hefty water for any 8 hour stability runs and 24/7 running?
Soldato
You have to remember that AMD measure the temperature different to Intel. They measure a temp on the CPU, and on the board and then apply an offset, so it can be quite different depending on the board and other factors.
The Phenoms had the same issue.
Soldato
It's a bit of a pain because it makes you unsure of how much you can push a chip