Soldato
AMD Bulldozer FX-8 Eight Core 8120@8150 for £115 after cashback now, got to be best cpu in that price range now?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Bulldozer FX-8 Eight Core 8120@8150 for £115 after cashback now, got to be best cpu in that price range now?
AMD Bulldozer FX-8 Eight Core 8120@8150 for £115 after cashback now, got to be best cpu in that price range now?
For certain situations yes (This is why I wish Intel had lower priced i5's)

You don't lower perfection![]()
For certain situations yes (This is why I wish Intel had lower priced i5's)
It's been under 100 pound with cash back previously, 115 after cash back is actually quite poor for the FX8120 in recent times.
For highly threaded situations it offers unbeatable price/performance, and even more so when it was sub 100 after cash back.
For general usage it's a mixed bag, as you probably won't notice a difference between a plethora of CPU's from both vendors.
Since I'm putting together a NAS as a home-media server and will be ripping my bluray collection to it, Bulldozer is tempting me.
I was intending to rip losslessly. Buying bigger drives is all well and good but by the time I've spent the money on an Intel CPU I'll have less cash available for Drive space. By going this route I can make my NAS more efficient space wise and also get bigger drives. And in day to day use I'll see no difference.buying more hard drive space and havining 1:1 rips makes more sense to me than buying a cpu to re-encode the movies to save a few gb .
For general usage you won't notice the difference between most CPU's from the last 3 years or so. If you play BF3 or use really CPU intensive applications that don't multithread very well you won't benefit from Bulldozer. If you constantly use apps that can utilise all cores like encoding video in Handbrake then Bulldozer will kick some ass.
), from remembering the reviews, I think BF3 is one of the few gaming exceptions where bulldozer does well, but yes I agree with the general sentiment.lol. yeah thatll be release Q3 2012... and Haswell gets released Q2 2013... Unless piledriver is a serious stepup in performance (we can but pray) else... if Piledriver is another Bulldozer... then Haswell will blow it out of the water.
That we don't know... Ivybridge was underwhelming , even a step or two backwards in some respects so Intel aren't immune to their own problems.
^^^^ Steamrooler is out not long after Haswell and then xavier a year after that.
It has to be said; the rumour mill is that Piledriver will be missed out completely, instead to concentrate on Steamrooler and getting it on the shelves sooner than originally planed, which was late in 2013.


Steamroller will be out about 1 year from now, by the majority of reports.
If it really is as good as it should be, with the original AMD64 designers back on AMD's staff, then I'll sell my 2500k and welcome AMD back into my life with open arms
But only if it's better than my 2500k, I'm not downgrading![]()
do amd make anything that won't bottleneck 3 of their top cards? Seems weird that the only way to fully utilise their own tri-fire and quad-fire fully is to not buy their own processors.
.