*Listen* to what people are saying you will not notice the difference between a £1200 PC and a £2500 PC.
.
You will when you are talking high end case/monitor/K+M/printer/speakers/headphones. hat alone will probably come to 1k.
*Listen* to what people are saying you will not notice the difference between a £1200 PC and a £2500 PC.
.
One point, for the specs that have listed SSD's .... these are 2.5" so you might need this, or equivalent, in order to fit them.
If you're going to wait for GT300 there's little point in getting specs now - as I'm sure you're aware the computer industry is fast moving and prices/specs will have changed (perhaps significantly) by the time you are ready to buy.
I'll just clear something up - The computer will not solely be used for gaming, it will be used for a little bit of everything I suppose - MS Office, Photoshop, PowerDirector, Browsing, Music, Video/Movies, and anything else that might crop up. However, I enjoy gaming and this will probably be what I will spend most of my time doing with it.
I understand the point that a lot of people are making about the financial aspect but I am still unconvinced by the arguments that you can spend £1000 and get a similarly performing machine plus high quality peripherals.
I do not want an i5 machine as I believe that this will restrict any future upgrade to i9 (i.e. rather than just the CPU change it would be mobo, CPU, & RAM), there is also the whole lack of PCI-e 16x 16x support for future Crossfire or SLi (not sure how much affect this has but it must have some).
Please, if you have a problem with me spending my money how I want then by all means start a new thread about low-end Vs mid-range Vs high-end, I will read it with interest, but I am bored of listening to the same old argument to be honest, like there should be a cap on how much anyone should spend on a PC. There is no right or wrong here, it's about personal preference and if I can afford it - I have chosen to buy a high-end machine and I can afford it, all I wanted was some opinions as to the tech that performs well in my price range not a debate on the morality of spending money.
Thanks to everyone who has been kind enough to do a spec, you have given me some good food for thought.
I did say earlier in the thread that I will be building this thing mid-November and if the GT300 is still months away I will get a cheap place-holder in the mean time (perhaps a 260, or a 2nd hand 285 etc.)
I know that the industry moves fast and that it would be pointless to get a spec now for a build in 6 months time, but the fact is that I am building in 6 weeks time.
snip.
he hasn't got £5k you want to finish that spec of for under £1k (excluding gfx card) it's not going to happen.
Similar to one of these monsters? I think if I had £5,000-£10,000 to spend the dual Xeon set-up might come into play.
This is not a serverSo at £1300 he has RAM, CPUx2, and MB.
He has £1450 to finish of the system. The SSDs are more optional, essentially he could just get one £250 SSD, 2xSTAT 1TB (£100) and he's got £1100 for other bits and peices, he could easily finish that off that much, you can order a prebuillt dual Xeon server for that £2750!