Average speed camera networks will be upon us next year.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/driving/article4909662.ece
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/driving/article4909662.ece
Great, more reason for people to speedo watch and cause silly accidents. I assume this will just be a Motorway type affair.
The new cameras, known as Specs3, will cost typically £300,000 per network. They are likely to be deployed first on long rural A roads, where crashes occur frequently but in many different places, making it impractical to deploy conventional speed cameras, which each cover less than 100 yards of road.
Is it correct what Jeremy Clarkson said about these?
That if you change lane it cannot detect your average speed.
Jim Fitzpatrick, the Road Safety Minister, said yesterday that the new cameras would bring significant safety benefits as well as reduce congestion by making traffic flow more smoothly.
On the M1 the number of casualties halved after average-speed cameras were introduced on a contraflow between junctions 6a and 10.
From start of the road to the end of the road, you're probably right. But from camera to camera? I can see average speeds beeing significantly higher.[TW]Fox;12660213 said:Another thought - long rural A roads, average speed..
I dont know about you guys but when I'm pressing on down a Rural A road on a journey my average speed isnt really that far above 60, especially when you consider having to slow for bends, junctions, overtake slower cars, etc.