*points to anandtech review*
2133 c10 is the sweet spot for haswell
For discrete GPU users, recommending any kit over another is a tough call. In light of daily workloads, a good DDR3-1866 C9 MHz kit will hit the curve on the right spot to remain cost effective. Users with a few extra dollars in their back pocket might look towards 2133 C9/2400 C10, which moves a little up the curve and has the potential should a game come out that is heavily memory dependent.
If you tune the subs with high perf RAM you can get another few FPS in BF4 etc which need bandwidth. Its not just primary timings at all.
Glade you know best Dice Hunter![]()
Reading this I think answers the question as to if I should buy some higher speed Ram
I hope the answer is a no![]()
Glade you know best Dice Hunter![]()
Reading this I think answers the question as to if I should buy some higher speed Ram
If you tune the subs with high perf RAM you can get another few FPS in BF4 etc which need bandwidth. Its not just primary timings at all.
If you tune the subs with high perf RAM you can get another few FPS in BF4 etc which need bandwidth. Its not just primary timings at all.
[ZiiP]carrot;25711211 said:To be fair, he probably doesn't (he's even admitted to that) but this advert just stinks of terrible marketing. Gamers are much better off investing the money elsewhere.
32gb of Corsair Vengeance Pro Red 2400mhz is £320. 16gb of Corsair Vengeance Pro Gold 1600MHz is £150. That's £170 for (apparently) 6fps.
But yeah, ok, that's right, maybe you do get that extra fps. At least show it in a proper graph and don't wrap it up in some terrible marketing crap
And you're probably a great example who'd be better off investing the money in another 770 for SLI!
There was an interesting test Linus from NCIX did not so long ago about the performance of RAM and game FPS, Going from 1333 all the way up to the 3GHZ stuff saw an FPS increase of 1-2 maximum.
But for productivity fast stuff is awesome![]()