SSD options

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
13,276
Location
Northallerton/Harrogate
Hello,

Apparently I have an Asus P6X58D-E Intel X58 motherboard, which I've had since Jan 2010. It has, I am led to beleive USB 3.0 and SATA 6GB/s ports on it.
All of these are currently taken up by 7200 rpm hard disks of sorts, and a DVD drive.

I don't NEED all these disks connected, but they are at the moment, until I shuffle data around between them and back it up.

I do have a 750GB drive and a 500GB one (maybe it's a 1TB) that store audio sample libraries on them. I probably have a few hundred GB of samples in total, maybe up to 500 nowadays.

I would like to invest in some kind of SSD to enable me to load these samples a lot quicker, but SSDs are expensive. - I don't really care about write speed, as once they're on the disk, the samples won't generally be updated.

What are my (best) options? I don't necessarily have to have ALL my samples in SSD land, because that'll be too expensive I guess... but perhaps (depending on my bonus this month) I can afford a 256GB one... maybe two...(or should I get a smaller one for OS/Key APPs?)

What's the best option? for me.... given my motherboard.
Could/should I also look at a PCI-E SATA card (i think I have a spare slot) to give me more storage room? I'm guessing my PSU will limit me there. I've pretty much run out of spare connectors, unless I can find a molex > sata converter.
 
I own a crucial m4 and at the time it was the best bang for the buck and its been given a ton of great speed reviews (including here on ocuk) ...
the new intel 520 series may be quicker but they are not using the marvell controller and went with sandforce.

IMO even with the above info - Id choose the crucial over the intel. Have had no issues with mine and the cost/performance outweigh what intel has.
Just choose the size you think you will need/afford.
Funny thing is when I bought mine the m4 was still cheeper then the intel 320 which was only sata2; but much faster.

Oh - write speeds are a bit lower on the crucial compared to the intel but like you said - get the stuff on there and read it off ... so thats what the m4 will do.
 
I own a crucial m4 and at the time it was the best bang for the buck and its been given a ton of great speed reviews (including here on ocuk) ...
the new intel 520 series may be quicker but they are not using the marvell controller and went with sandforce.

However they come with a 5 year warranty which means they must have very high build quality.
 
However they come with a 5 year warranty which means they must have very high build quality.

true - intel ssd have been rated quite high in terms of failure rate ... and having a 5 year warr. doesnt hurt ...

they are about 100pounds more for a comperable crucial (256 gig) ... so whatever works ...
 
Back
Top Bottom