Right. An SSD question that is still bugging me.
I am speccing a build.
On the SSD front I am thinking about:
2 x G.Skill Falcon 128GB
One for operating system. One for programs. (With seperate other normal sata drives for storage)
The reason being that I install a ton of programs (well over 100). And every other PC I have owned has ended up crashing and buggy.
Now, as I understand it (I could be wrong). SSDs do not fragment in the same way as conventional hard drives.
So, if instead of 2 ssd drives, I just bought 1, and put BOTH the operating system AND all my hundreds of programs on it (and did the usual install, uninstall stuff if a program was rubbish). But still had the seperate sata drive for storage.
Then would the system get buggy?
Or it would it be ok because its an ssd and not a conventional hard drive, and still stay nice and fast?
Or am I better off with my original plan?
I am speccing a build.
On the SSD front I am thinking about:
2 x G.Skill Falcon 128GB
One for operating system. One for programs. (With seperate other normal sata drives for storage)
The reason being that I install a ton of programs (well over 100). And every other PC I have owned has ended up crashing and buggy.
Now, as I understand it (I could be wrong). SSDs do not fragment in the same way as conventional hard drives.
So, if instead of 2 ssd drives, I just bought 1, and put BOTH the operating system AND all my hundreds of programs on it (and did the usual install, uninstall stuff if a program was rubbish). But still had the seperate sata drive for storage.
Then would the system get buggy?
Or it would it be ok because its an ssd and not a conventional hard drive, and still stay nice and fast?
Or am I better off with my original plan?
Last edited:
), only need raid if your useing JMicon based SSDs or messing with Big 5gb files (200MB/s it 2-3x faster then most hdds)