Caporegime
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 77,501
- Location
- Wish i was in a Ramen Shop Counter
No personal attacks. The van over took and DIDN'T leave any space and simply started cutting him up. Instead of rushing to where he wanted to be he should have simply waited to slow down and see if the cyclist was going to continue on, or move to the left. Which is good highway code practice and again, something people would do with a motorcyclist. The van driver didn't. He overtook approaching a corner he intended to take without taking into consideration the intended direction of the cyclist. That move would have caused a crash if it had of been a car, motorbike, caravan or donkey. His behaviour afterwards was equally appalling and he deserved everything the courts gave him.
If the cyclist was a car, and the van cut him up like that and the car crashed into the side or back or him. The van would be at fault for taking away the car's braking distance.
Why does the cyclist have to move to the left anyway? Why can't he hold the lane he was in?