Poll: Suarez has to be banned for a year at least

[Frankiemac]

No way can FIFA brush this under the carpet.

Bloke need a minimum years ban and Liverpools should sack him and sue him like Chelsea did with the druggie.

 

[dmcg]

posted this on the other thread

On BBC radio reporter said a head FIFA figure confirmed FIFA have the power to revoke all football activities including club level

 

[Frankiemac]

Didnt see other thread !! oops

 

[dmcg]

I meant the world cup group thread

 

[Purdy]

I'd say he needs a 3 year ban from International football to be honest.

 

[Jokester]

Ah well I guess I'll be picking him up cheap in the FF mid way through the season again next year.

 

[omnomnom]

Ban him yes but sack him? Lol. 10 game international will do.

 

[Frankiemac]

I'd say he needs a 3 year ban from International football to be honest.

I would like a life ban but that will never happened. I reckon he should cop at least a year FULL ban from playing anywhere and then warned next offence is a life ban.

Should have got that warning after the last one.

 

[Earth[Tera].bin]

I say he needs a gum shield.

 

[Frankiemac]

Ban him yes but sack him? Lol. 10 game international will do.

Sack him in a heartbeat. Liverpool can easily sue him for breach of contract. I am sure I would get the sack if I commited the crime he just has.

Does that count as GBH ??

 

[a1ex2001]

Ban him yes but sack him? Lol. 10 game international will do.

Should be a global ban for 3-6 months an international only ban doesn't send anything like enough of a message the man is clearly scum the only people who will disagree are Liverpool fans who know without him or the massive transfer fee he could have brought in there season is over before it's begun.

 

[a1ex2001]

Weird double post

 

[Frankiemac]

Should be a global ban for 3-6 months an international only ban doesn't send anything like enough of a message the man is clearly scum the only people who will disagree are Liverpool dans who know without him of the massive transfer fee he could have brought in there season us over before it's begun.

Already had a 3 month ban effectively last time. 12 months min but agree what you say only Liverpool fans can see it any other way.

 

[Purdy]

Should be a global ban for 3-6 months an international only ban doesn't send anything like enough of a message the man is clearly scum the only people who will disagree are Liverpool fans who know without him or the massive transfer fee he could have brought in there season is over before it's begun.

Banning him through an international tournament would definitely hurt him more than for Liverpool or any club he goes to, I have no doubt he is one of those players who prefers his country over club.

 

[Finners]

His reaction after the game said it all really, He's expecting a ban

 

[Frankiemac]

Needs a full ban. Not even allowed to kick a can down the street !

 

[Jokester]

His reaction after the game said it all really, He's expecting a ban

Think he was more expecting any big transfer move to fall through to be honest.

 

[Pigeon_Killer]

Needs a full ban. Not even allowed to kick a can down the street !

That would rob the world of his footballing genius though. Better to forgive and forget imo.

 

[manic111]

I'm in no way condoning what he's done, but I still think the question stands regarding whether what he did is worse than what Keane did to Haaland.

The reasonable argument there is that Keane's ban was too short, but Fifa are not reasonable.

 

[omnomnom]

Already had a 3 month ban effectively last time. 12 months min but agree what you say only Liverpool fans can see it any other way.

I'd agree if he did it for Liverpool...but he didn't. It would be unfair to punish Liverpool or any other club if he moves to them. I'm not sure Fifa will go down that road to be honest and he'll get an international ban.