Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 5,386
Vega 56 here running high settings in Warzone @1440p and for the best part holding 75fps.
You don't need to spend £400
You don't need to spend £400
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I bought a r9 390 and it does 1440 beautifully.
Agree. Want to upgrade my Vega 56 as it's not enough for 1440. It's good enough for most games just on the limit for recent games.No it doesn't. A Vega 56 is starting to struggle for 1440 now, espically at higher frames.
And a 56 is about 40% faster than a 390. I went from a 390 to a vega.
3060ti/super or a 6700(xt?) will likely be the best choice in this price bracket. 5700xt will do watchdogs legion / red dead redemption / horizon zero dawn at 60fps @ 1440p with a bit of option tweaking but at ~£400 it's not good value right now.
A year ago, it was the absolute value king and a good buy. Now; i'd wait.
Honesty if you're looking for a £400 card right now the answer is spend another ~£50 and just get a 3070. In a few months we should have some decent mid range options like 3060/etc for more sensible money though.
Depends on game & settings. Using an RX 480 now, so close to a 390, and it does quite well at 1440p. Heck, playing WD:L now and it does >45 fps no sweat, and if the game weren't so CPU limited it could do better. Sure, if you want >60 fps that's not gonna happen, or ultra everything, or the odd game like RDR2, but in general you can definitely make it work to near 60 fps at 1440p.No it doesn't. A Vega 56 is starting to struggle for 1440 now, espically at higher frames.
And a 56 is about 40% faster than a 390. I went from a 390 to a vega.
Depends on game & settings. Using an RX 480 now, so close to a 390, and it does quite well at 1440p. Heck, playing WD:L now and it does >45 fps no sweat, and if the game weren't so CPU limited it could do better. Sure, if you want >60 fps that's not gonna happen, or ultra everything, or the odd game like RDR2, but in general you can definitely make it work to near 60 fps at 1440p.
When I had a Vega 64 I'd push 1800p @ 60 fps more often than not. These cards are beasts! But people gotta stop just maxing out every setting.
I’d suggest saving a few quid more and getting at least a 3070, we are talking £50 more, remember patience is a virtue, virtue is a grace, put them both together makes a happy smiling 1440 faceHi all,
I've recently upgraded my monitor from a 24" 1080p to 27" 1440p and think I need to upgrade my graphics card. I'm currently running a gtx 1060 6 GB and I'm very aware of the new 3 series and big Navi but they're out of my price range and I'm looking to get something pretty soon. I'm not bothered about having everything on Ultra, ideally just to be able to run things on high at 60fps.
Any recommendations please?
No it doesn't. A Vega 56 is starting to struggle for 1440 now, espically at higher frames.
And a 56 is about 40% faster than a 390. I went from a 390 to a vega.