They only checked a sample of products, also accounting can make a profit as small or big as you want it. Is this 1-4% profit after all costs, or the differential between purchase price and retail price?
There defenitly is more than a 4% margin on the latter, whether its intermediate distributors sucking it all out as profit or the supermarket, but when I worked in manufacturing we only used distributors for the small shops, we sold directly to supermarkets and the margin was nowhere near 4% it wasnt single figures.
Some examples cost for unit for the SKU to get out of the door 6p per packet. Cost on supermarket shelf 26p per packet. Where has the 20p gone if its only 4%?
I also do keep in touch with people so some have idea of current figures as well, again 4% is not even in the right ball park.
Look at their annual accounts, they are a listed company, it’s literally a matter of public record. The 1-4% margin is after the costs of running their business. If their gross margin was 4%, they couldn’t even afford for the product to be picked up from the manufacturer and moved to the store.
No accountants can’t ‘make the profit look smaller’ and in fact that’s the exact opposite of what they would want. They are a listed company, low profits mean a lower share price and ****** off shareholders because they get smaller returns, puts the company at risk of takeover, lower pay and bonuses for those running it and puts them at risk of being ousted by the shareholders.
Their profit margins are consistently low, year on year because food retail is a highly competitive beast, that’s the nature of the sector they operate in. It’s why over the years they have tried to diversify into sectors which are more profitable such as banking, mobile phones and garden centres.
Question is, would all this waste in supermarkets be there e.g. if like manufacturers they had cost pressures, so e.g. if they were forced to sell at a fixed price for X number of years, and to survive they had to get efficient.
Why would you assign people to observe self checkouts if was no enforcement, an example of waste. Paying someone to do something that has no meaningful benefit other than data collection.
It’s very easy to criticise from the outside but opinions are just that, they are rarely based on fact these days. If you think you can do a better job of cutting bloat at Tesco, I’m sure they will be all ears.
Have you ever used a self service checkout? If you did, you’d quickly realise why they need someone supervising them. For example weight errors, security tags, customer mistakes, items not scanning, vouchers not working, mis-priced products, machine errors, self scan compliance checks and even replacing the receipt roll when it runs out. It’s also why one person can supervise 8-10 self checkouts because it’s a much lower workload than them running it through the checkout themselves.
It’s comments like that and ‘fancy accounting’ which just utterly destroy the credibility of your posts in this thread.