Poll: Syrian Chemical Weapon Attack
- Thread starter Craig1981
- Start date
syria has been dropping barrels from helicopters that contain tankshells and apparently it's a warcrime? because they kill indiscriminately.
you could say the same for all dumb bombs and artillery shells.
none batted an eyelid when america was dropping 15,000 lb daisy cutters on mountain sides in afghanistan not all the people who lived under the taliban were taliban and we know they liked to hide in villages etc.
seems one rule for the west and another for people we don't like?
Soldato
Yes but it was the bad rebels. Not the good rebels - aka the Free Syria Army.
As reported by the good old BBC:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...arity-cash-going-to-Syrian-terror-groups.html
goes to terrorists still atleast some of it
anyway as I posted on the previous page the FSA are a joke army
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=25016040&postcount=2336
anything they gain the terrorists just take it from them.....
Soldato
I hope you interpreted my post as sarcasm - as intended!
Caporegime
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...e-launching-chlorine-attacks-on-children.html
Time for a bump as the Telegraph claims that the Assad regime is still using Chemical Weapons in its citizens
With these renewed claims and Russia destroying whatever credibility it had on the international stage, is it time to re-visit the subject of intervention in the Syrian civil war?
Time for a bump as the Telegraph claims that the Assad regime is still using Chemical Weapons in its citizens
With these renewed claims and Russia destroying whatever credibility it had on the international stage, is it time to re-visit the subject of intervention in the Syrian civil war?
Soldato
Time for a bump as the Telegraph claims that the Assad regime is still using Chemical Weapons in its citizens
The word here in "claims" you're be in a mental hospital soon.
Soldato
I see Assad is holding elections? lol wut?
I wonder who will win hmmmmmm?
I wonder who will win hmmmmmm?
Caporegime
Soldato
Soldato
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 7,963
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...e-launching-chlorine-attacks-on-children.html
Time for a bump as the Telegraph claims that the Assad regime is still using Chemical Weapons in its citizens
Sure, so ISIS can then take over the entirerity of Syria. Because thats a massive improvement.
The West has no stomach for a face-to-face troops on the ground fight against ISIS at present and the Syrian army is currently tying up a good part of ISIS's forces.
Last edited:
Caporegime
Great! only another 199,999 to go.....
Man of Honour
Every little helps...
Caporegime
The greatest journey starts with a single step
Doh realised I posted this in the wrong thread, was meant to go in the Islamic State thread, not the Syrian Chemical Weapons thread. Sorry about that folks.
Perhaps everybody is looking at this the wrong way.
The reason why Assad is using improvised weaponry such as chemicals and cobbled together munitions (Oil drums full of old shells dropped from aircraft for example) is because this is all he has available. Not because it is his favoured choice. (Wouldn't you do so if the alternative was to face defeat by ISIS??)
Rather than sanctioning Assad, we should be supplying him with more advanced and, hopefully, more discriminating weaponry?
Civil wars generally are best resolved quickly by a decisive victory by one side or another. Long drawn out conflicts cause lasting damage no matter who wins. However, A victory by ISIS is unacceptable so the only sensible alternative is to support a rapid victory by Assad, and providing with him help where appropriate to achieve this!
The reason why Assad is using improvised weaponry such as chemicals and cobbled together munitions (Oil drums full of old shells dropped from aircraft for example) is because this is all he has available. Not because it is his favoured choice. (Wouldn't you do so if the alternative was to face defeat by ISIS??)
Rather than sanctioning Assad, we should be supplying him with more advanced and, hopefully, more discriminating weaponry?
Civil wars generally are best resolved quickly by a decisive victory by one side or another. Long drawn out conflicts cause lasting damage no matter who wins. However, A victory by ISIS is unacceptable so the only sensible alternative is to support a rapid victory by Assad, and providing with him help where appropriate to achieve this!
Soldato
Good riddance. A good day
Now can we go for his idiot widow?I think given that we're not carpet bombing 100,000's of them and instead targetting key members is indicative what the plan is. Surgical strikes with greatest effect. Hopefully it helps reinforce the message, if you go from the UK to Syria, prepare to die.
Last edited:
Soldato
Ummmm, right so you know nothing then.
Do you know he murdered civilians that were protesting against the regime right? And continues to this day.
lol, he didnt know how to hold a rifle properly either, judging by that photo.
Last edited: