Comeback is on!![]()
Unfortunately too little too late methinks!
Comeback is on!![]()
Zverev is just annoyingly too good.
Not sure - hopefully we will, and he'll be a decent top 20-30 player.Agreed. With all due respect to Fery's previous opponents, Zverev is a step up in class and it showed. Let's not be disappointed though - semi-finals is a heck of an achievement and every indication we'll be seeing plenty of him in the future.
Is Jack Draper really tall too?Not sure - hopefully we will, and he'll be a decent top 20-30 player.
I really struggle to look beyond the height, though. The last time there was a genuinely top player under 6ft was Hewitt, and that was pre-Federer who basically completely changed the sport.
Fery's trick is being great at picking the ball up on the baseline and not getting pushed too far back, which rushes opponents. Unfortunately, if you come up against real power (like Zverev showed today, or Sinner, or Alcaraz), you've basically got to be a miracle worker to survive. And even the less powerful better players will be more prepared for his tactics in future.
I'd love him to do well, but I struggle to see him breaking the top 10 consistently, if at all.
Zverev is just annoyingly too good.
I really struggle to look beyond the height, though. The last time there was a genuinely top player under 6ft was Hewitt, and that was pre-Federer who basically completely changed the sport.
Yes. Prior to Hewitt. I'm not sure what your point is?Actually, Agassi won Wimbledon in 1992 and he's apparently 5 foot 11 inches.
I think about 6 ft 4.Is Jack Draper really tall too?
Yes. Prior to Hewitt. I'm not sure what your point is?
I thought it was just Sinner the drug cheat and Zverev the domestic abuser?Bit gutted but hopefully he kicks on.
What a terrible final 3, all three full of controversy.
It's a bit of a sad thought to think that Fery will likely never win in this era where height and power matter most but aftee your explanation I do understand why now.Yes. Prior to Hewitt. I'm not sure what your point is?
I think about 6 ft 4.
Edit: Agassi is one of the more similar players to Fery, in many ways - both have great backhands, both relatively small, and both own the baseline rather than getting pushed back. But (a) Andre played in an era when players were generally smaller - even Sampras who was renowned as the big server was only 6 ft 1. (b) Relatedly, players just didn't have the power they do now - that was more than 20 years ago, racket tech and sports science has increased power hugely. Similarly, players get way more top spin now than ever before given the strings and the slower courts - Fery will be dealing with balls jumping off the baseline at his chin on other surfaces. (c) Agassi was basically a freak - I don't think, probably with the exception of Roger, that there's ever been a more naturally talented player.
I'm not saying Fery can't also do that, but he's giving 3 inches away to Agassi, in an era where height, spin and power matters more than ever, and he's going to have to be absurdly talented to get far. At his height, he can't merely be very good.
Sinner is going to win this semi final quite comfortably
And with Sinner being a lot younger, it will be much harder for Novak too.I think you're right. Djokovic has made amazing comebacks before but I feel winning the next three consecutive sets is too much given how good Sinner is playing.
especially in this heatAnd with Sinner being a lot younger, it will be much harder for Novak too.
