That was annoying....

teaboy5 said:
Well if what he said is correct, it was behind the mans gate. This would mean he is still on the mans land, as the whole outer bit of the field belongs to him.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily, you have to be very careful saying things like that, because without looking at the deeds of the land very carefully to see where the official boundaries of the land are, in relation to any fences, gates, hedges etc, you could easily find that the boundary ends at the hedge/fence/gate etc and the area of land between that boundary and the road is actually public land, and part of the public highway so Phate would have every right to stand there all day long doing whatever he wishes to.
 
V-Spec said:
Why the instant assumption that he's telling lies and was trespassing? and why the hostile attitude?

You weren't there, you don't know any better, so why bother with the scathing remarks over something you know nothing about?
Click to expand...

I have came to this assumption, because good old phate sometimes like to add or leave a little from his stories.

But if it went down like this fair play to him
 
teaboy5 said:
I have came to this assumption, because good old phate sometimes like to add or leave a little from his stories.
Click to expand...

You say this, but you were not there. You can take or leave my word for it, nobody is forcing you to do anything. I only wish I had a video camera on me!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom