I paid £1350 second hand and I'm more than happy enough despite the inflated used price.
Faster than a 5080.
More VRAM than a 5080.
Cheaper than a lot of 5080's.
It's in my case. I'm using it.
I won't be disappointed when the quite obvious 5080 Super/Ti/Super Ti comes out with more VRAM smashing the 5080 over the park.
I know there's the whole frame gen thing, but watching some reviews it seems to be a bit of a gimmick at times. Give me real frames over AI frames. Also, I know the card won't brick itself if I update the GPU drivers.
I just cannot bring myself to spend more than £2000 on a GPU despite being able to afford it comfortably. Not that I'd be able to get a 5090 if I wanted.
In my now biased opinion, I think the 4090 is a bit of a freak; those who got one when they came out must be over the moon and I think it's madness to sell it like some have to get a 5080 instead.
I'm at 3440x1440 UW so I do think as well with the current crop of games a 5090 would be wasted on me. I played GoW Ragnarök last night, compared to my 3080 it was much smoother, higher FPS and doesn't really use that much more power (I think it was about 30w more at the wall). 60-65 degrees with pretty quiet as well. I'm proper chuffed.
I guess a 4070 Super Ti or even a 4080 would have given me a large boost but they're nearly £800 or so new, and very scarce second hand, plus I wanted the VRAM headroom.
Again, I'm probably being biased but that's an insight into my thought process.