The Banter Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Looks like the decision will be no, when the club threads were stopped things improved a lot and this sounds just as bad if not worse

as I said you can have loads of threads on a related topic but this would just be really messy, tbh the transfer thread was not great

Club threads segregated the forum into groups of supporters. That's why discussion was stagnated. This is a thread for all supporters and general chat, therefore discussion will be diverse on a range of topics without cluttering up the forum with threads containing just a video or the like.

No reason why we can't just make a new one every month or so is there?

Think of it as a long-term match day thread.
 
Spurs new-boy taunts Arsenal ahead of cup showdown.

Rafael van der Vaart has goaded Arsenal ahead of Tuesday's Carling Cup derby clash by insisting Tottenham are the bigger club.

New-boy Van der Vaart, who signed for Spurs from Real Madrid on transfer deadline day, notched a penalty against Wolves on his home debut on Saturday.

And ahead of Tottenham's visit of the Gunners at White Hart Lane this week, the Dutch midfielder said: "Spurs are the bigger club."

Thatta boy :D
 
Introductory offer, only £9.99

chamwow.jpg
 
Stadium plans approved by council

Tottenham's new stadium plans have been approved by Haringey Council's planning committee.

In what Haringey Council say will be "an overhaul of north Tottenham", the Premier League club will redevelop White Hart Lane in a £400million project.

The new stadium will have a capacity of more than 56,000.

Council leader Claire Kober said: "The Spurs development has the potential to make a huge impact, not just on the success of the football club, but also on the whole of Tottenham - delivering job opportunities, regenerating the area, and boosting the local economy.

"We're proud of Spurs' rich history in Haringey and excited that the club has committed its future to the area.

"We look forward to seeing the development unfold and are confident that it will deliver fantastic improvements to this part of the borough."

A statement from the council said: "The plans will now be referred to English Heritage, the Mayor of London and the Secretary of State for a final decision."
 
LOL at Sullivan! :D

West Ham owner David Sullivan has warned there will be riots in east London if rivals Tottenham move to the Olympic Park stadium after the Games.

Sullivan fears 'civil unrest' due to massive opposition from football fans in the West Ham heartland to Tottenham's proposed relocation.

He said: 'It would be such a slap in the face to east London. If it happens, there will be real problems that could easily lead to civil unrest.

'I think there could be riots, such is the ill feeling between West Ham and Spurs and I know the police feel the same.'

A Tottenham relocation emerged on Tuesday as a strong possibility, with sports and entertainment company AEG, who are partnering Tottenham in their official proposal to the 2012 legacy company, putting their considerable weight behind it.

As well as alienating West Ham, who had talks with AEG before they linked up with Spurs, the plan not to include a running track in the football conversion will infuriate London 2012, who have made repeated pledges that track and field will be a permanent legacy from the Games.

Spurs fans, who have not been consulted on moving from Tottenham High Road, will be exercised further by the transfer to Stratford looking increasingly like the preferred option rather than merely a back-up to the Northumberland Development Project at White Hart Lane.

Sullivan said: 'I feel very let down by Tottenham. The way they do business is not right. They pinched Eidur Gudjohnsen off us after we brought him from Barcelona for talks. He just disappeared from the hotel. And the way they unsettled Scott Parker was appalling.

'Now they want to move into our borough of Newham. How would they like it if we suddenly set up a new home in Haringey. I'm flabbergasted by the cheek of it.'

Both Tottenham and AEG insist that a football stadium doesn't work with a running track.

AEG president Tim Leiweke said: 'We want the venue to be perfect for football for the next 30 years, rather than the odd athletics meeting. Tottenham are a good fit whose supporters can fill a 60,000 stadium, while it would be a bit of a miracle if West Ham are in the top five of the Premier League.'

Leiweke was given the opportunity to make his pitch with Tottenham by the Olympic Park Legacy Company not insisting on a running track being part of the tender process.

And his comment: 'We are selective with our projects and successful' is confirmation that this is no Plan B for Tottenham.


 
My heart says Spurs should remain in Tottenham and help regenerate the economy in their ancestral homeland, my brain thinks that if they move to the Olympic stadium they will become bigger due to superior transport links and not be financially crippled by a £3-400m WHL rebuild.

I'm undecided.

I agree tbh.

Does anybody know the terms of either West Ham or Spurs moving to the Olympic stadium? It would be interesting to know how much they're going to have to pay to use the stadium and if they'll ever have the option of purchasing it.

No idea. The idea that it's our preferred option has only been revealed this week. I'm a bit surprised really.
 
New-boy Van der Vaart, who signed for Spurs from Real Madrid on transfer deadline day, notched a penalty against Wolves on his home debut on Saturday.

And ahead of Tottenham's visit of the Gunners at White Hart Lane this week, the Dutch midfielder said: "Spurs are the bigger club."
 
Ok, well he has shown enough to suggest that he can grow into the league and improve, hopefully he'll come good. Since you made comparisons with other teams second strikers, he's started better than Berbatov did ;)

Berbatov got into the swing of things straight away.

Spurs aren't exactly Arsenal's close rivals tbf, I meant Man Utd. There's a difference between adjusting to Spurs and Man Utd.

What does that have to do with adjusting to the PL?
 
Looks like Redknapp has stamped his mark on Spurs:

Pre-Redknapp = Spurs make a pre-tax profit of £39.9m
With Redknapp = Spurs make pre-tax loss of £6.5m

He really has turned things around ;)

You and I both know that Redknapp has nothing to do with the finances at Spurs.

The fact of the matter is that we have been investing more into the club to provide future stability. These things come at a price.
 
I've not looked at the accounts in detail but an article I read said the turnaround was almost completely down to player trading and wages. You're trying to say that Redknapp has nothing to do with this?

Redknapp tells Levy who he wants, and Levy goes about the business. Any financial matters rest with Levy and I'm glad it works that way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom