Is there a reason manufacturers are going for multiple sensors with different lenses, rather than single larger sensor.
Larger sensor means bigger lens, including depth.
Is there a reason manufacturers are going for multiple sensors with different lenses, rather than single larger sensor.
That's a shame as I would imagine that would improve quality far more. Wonder how thick a phone would be with a sensor twice as big which would be 4X the area.Larger sensor means bigger lens, including depth.
Do you think the vast majority of DSLR photos go anywhere beyond Facebook either?
The best camera is the one you have on you, and unless you're a pro you won't be toting your DLSR everywhere you go either - going to a party, will you bring your camera? Going out for dinner, will you bring your camera? Having a good phone camera is massive because it means you don't have to have a decent separate camera on those occasions you don't want to be on a photography trip.
I'm thinking more and more about whether or not to keep my gear and either buy a more compact camera, like an RX100.
I find this apparent consumer demand confusing in phones. ....On these handsets, detail, DR, noise, sharpness are pretty much a mute point, editing latitude not relevant...
Yeah but it's a contradiction in terms to want the best picture quality and use a phone.
...My point being that the vast majority, maybe 98%, will never ever leave the confines of the handset and therefore nearly impossible to differentiate from a flagship camera of 3 years ago so I suppose my question is born of the fact that at the top of nearly everyone’s hit list is a better camera, in actual fact they couldn’t tell if it was the same camera as last years model simply being displayed to them on a better handset screen.
My phone never gets used for photos as I use it as a phone and make calls,when ever I'm out (not working) my camera goes out with me,my bag is always ready to be picked up.