Man of Honour
Found another....
The Cooper Falling Body Photograph
- Thread starter Edrof
- Start date
![[FnG]magnolia](/styles/overclockers/avatars/9.png){kind=avatar}
Caporegime
#40 - That is beautiful.
Also, regal.
Also, regal.
Last edited:
Associate
Photo is fake as they didn't have lesbians with kids in those days
Associate
When you see it, you will **** bricks.
The patio doors?
Soldato
looks like a double exposure to me...
Associate
The guy is clearly a member of Team America, he's got himself in some bother and he is signaling the others with the Secret Signal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92d1xtjXf8E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92d1xtjXf8E
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 3,859
Pretty sure I saw this years ago..
Thought the story was the bloke falling had killed himself upstairs and something happened to the floor or something.
Although, theres clearly no debris falling with him.
I reckon he'd gafataped himself to the ceiling ready to photobomb.
Thought the story was the bloke falling had killed himself upstairs and something happened to the floor or something.
Although, theres clearly no debris falling with him.
I reckon he'd gafataped himself to the ceiling ready to photobomb.
Where does it say 1999 there?
Mores the point, what the hell is he linking to?!
Soldato
Obviously a guy on the 1st floor landing hanging over the edge and photobombing... 
It's convenient how these "ghosts" etc. always seem to be in really old, low quality, grainy photos, taken with most likely poor quality cameras and developed using old fashioned, low quality techniques.
One of the believers, please go ahead and prove me wrong by providing a modern high-res undoctored photo...
It's convenient how these "ghosts" etc. always seem to be in really old, low quality, grainy photos, taken with most likely poor quality cameras and developed using old fashioned, low quality techniques.
One of the believers, please go ahead and prove me wrong by providing a modern high-res undoctored photo...
Obviously a guy on the 1st floor landing hanging over the edge and photobombing...
It's convenient how these "ghosts" etc. always seem to be in really old, low quality, grainy photos, taken with most likely poor quality cameras and developed using old fashioned, low quality techniques.
One of the believers, please go ahead and prove me wrong by providing a modern high-res undoctored photo...
This may alarm some people. View at your own risk.
Soldato
This may alarm some people. View at your own risk.
Fair enough, I'm sold!
I think it's the file name that convinced me that is a genuine photo.
Soldato
You have to do a special dance to summon dickybob
Soldato
Double exposure?
That exposed on the film before, the film was forgotten about, put back in camera thinking it was fresh, take that snap = double exposure?
That exposed on the film before, the film was forgotten about, put back in camera thinking it was fresh, take that snap = double exposure?
Man of Honour
Convenient that there's enough space in the composition to allow for a "Ghost".
I BELIEVE.
I BELIEVE.
Soldato
Yeah, keep up MrK!
Okay, some questions for you all:
I'd guess at late-1950s for the last question.
Okay, some questions for you all:
- Can anyone make out any details in the shadow's 'head'?
- If it was a double exposure, could the film have been placed back in the camera upside down? (If so, the shadow could be a photo of someone dancing, perhaps.)
- What year would you estimate the photo to be from?
I'd guess at late-1950s for the last question.
From the lens vignetting it very much looks like the photo was centered and outcropped, or cropped symmetrically.
Unless an uncropped version can be found I will firmly believe the photo was taken with space specially arranged on the left.