"The Crazy" Part II: Another non-relationship thread

Stinky · 22 Jan 2008 at 15:29

platypus said:
Whats the group called?

just

OcUK just like that

Burnsy2023 · 22 Jan 2008 at 15:32

sara said:
Alternatively TWAIN is another one for the amusement factor of what the acronym stands for...

It stands for nothing!!! And PnP isn't a protocol, it's technology.

I'm so sorry

Edit:

sara said:
titter!

Titter?! You dirty girl.

I really am sorry for my behaviour today, I'm in a very funny mood

Burnsy

Stinky · 22 Jan 2008 at 15:33

Burnsy2023 said:
It stands for nothing!!! And PnP isn't a protocol, it's technology.

I'm so sorry

Burnsy

Who invited the geek along

/runs

el_dazza · 22 Jan 2008 at 15:34

BAN!

Dinomania · 22 Jan 2008 at 15:35

OK, fine, UPnP is a set of protocols, close enough!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Plug_and_Play

"In computing, a protocol is a convention or standard that controls or enables the connection, communication, and data transfer between two computing endpoints."

Still snortworthy though.

TWAIN is an acronym!

Well, backronym. I still like it.

Stinky · 22 Jan 2008 at 15:35

el_dazza said:
BAN!

pfffffff shut it.

cleanbluesky · 22 Jan 2008 at 15:37

Sounds like he wanted a holiday bang maybe. You seem to pay a LOT of attention to him and that might make you seem unimportant, if you're hanging off his every gesture and being very reactive to him.

MOVE ON, there are lots of guys out there and you'd benefit from looking for another instead of chasing Mr NeverWas

Dinomania · 22 Jan 2008 at 15:39

Meh, I paid a lot of attention to him, because he paid a lot to me. It was unexpected and rather nice, why is that a bad thing?

All this crazy reactive girly stuff is being kept well away from his presence, most of us girls do it but don't often expose it to you lot (men) - so now you know

I'm actually far more controlled than most of my female mates, believe it or not!

Heee, Mr NeverWas! Nice.

Now can we get on with the protocol geekery?

Burnsy2023 · 22 Jan 2008 at 15:42

sara said:
Now can we get on with the protocol geekery?

Yes ma'am, now, shall we start networking privately, or networking our privates?

Burnsy

Stinky · 22 Jan 2008 at 15:49

Burnsy2023 said:
Yes ma'am, now, shall we start networking privately, or networking our privates?

Burnsy

thats good....

your backing up my comment on the amusing comments that you make lol

Dinomania · 22 Jan 2008 at 15:50

Burnsy2023 said:
Yes ma'am, now, shall we start networking privately, or networking our privates?

HURRR, snort, snigger.

That one's new to me

platypus · 22 Jan 2008 at 16:06

sara said:
Well, backronym. I still like it.

Do you prefer backronyms more then acronyms? Well?! Do Ya?! :eek:

.

I'd like you to handle my HTTP header request?

Dinomania · 22 Jan 2008 at 16:07

Now, platypus, that's just crude. Shame on you.

Stinky · 22 Jan 2008 at 16:08

where do you lot get these from??

Burnsy2023 · 22 Jan 2008 at 16:08

platypus said:
I'd like you to handle my HTTP header request?

No, because it brings up Error: 400. Naughty boy.

Burnsy

Dinomania · 22 Jan 2008 at 16:10

Stinky said:
where do you lot get these from??

I have a large database of assorted nerdry and geekdom in my head. Don't you?

Stinky · 22 Jan 2008 at 16:12

afraid not. can i steal yours please

lol

Burnsy2023 · 22 Jan 2008 at 16:15

What about NetBIOS? After all all you need in the evening after a few too many bottles of wine is a Basic input/output system. So surely NetBIOS, would equate to a threesome?

Burnsy

Dinomania · 22 Jan 2008 at 16:25

Dear oh dear. Enough!

platypus · 22 Jan 2008 at 16:26

I'd invite you to WINE and dine with me. Then we could have a bath with some enchanted SOAP, after which you and I could get down with some SQL_INSERTs into our RDBMS, after checking my PRIMARY_KEY. We'd use the usual _CONSTRAINTS of course to ensure there were no UNEXPECTED_RECORDs.