The disappearance of Nicola Bulley

Shouldn't be, but I'm leaning towards 1 of two options, which are: There's a second person involved and she was killed or abducted and the other is that perhaps insurance was/is a key.
 
My only complaint was them announcing priority that she fell in so early in the investigation.

Not quite. You complained that police hadn't cordoned and searched the area (they had). You complained they were focusing entirely on one theory (they weren't). You complained they had no evidence (they hadn't claimed to). You complained they instantly focused on her falling into the river (it was one week after she disappeared during which time various other lines of enquiry were explored).

The person jumping to conclusions without evidence here is you.
 
Am I not the only person that thinks that shes run off with someone else? It happens a lot and people just don't know what's going on in people's heads.
 
Back
Top Bottom