• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread

CAT-THE-FIFTH said:
Its 40% higher in DP performance than a GTX980TI. I wonder if AMD should have depreciated more of the DP performance,so they could actually run the GPU at a higher clockspeed in the same thermal envelope??

I don't see why it needs so much DP performance,when Hawaii is probably enough for said market??:confused:
Click to expand...

I suspect it wouldn't have made much more of a difference. Gisting those more knowledgeable, the entire arch and its subsystems are geared toward general compute. So with that in mind, alleviating the die of a few transistors more (than already wrt dp) may not sufficiently counteract the burden.
 
eddyr said:
I suspect it wouldn't have made much more of a difference. Gisting those more knowledgeable, the entire arch and its subsystems are geared toward general compute. So with that in mind, alleviating the die of a few transistors more (than already wrt dp) may not sufficiently counteract the burden.
Click to expand...

So could the Fury X not actually be a full chip ? i.e cut down ?
 
Dicehunter said:
So could the Fury X not actually be a full chip ? i.e cut down ?
Click to expand...

As in actually having beastly fp64 at 1/2 fp32 but only limited to 1/16 for consumer line? No idea, perhaps, god/amd knows.

Looking at transistor count (as questionable as they may actually be) 1.45x Hawaii = 9Billion is that enough with HBM mem controller offdie and also new features such as delta compression and whatever else to fit 8.9B fiji count?

Although what would be the point, as 4GB for such a WS card is less than ideal and if so would it ever then see the light of day?
 
Last edited:
Indeed, I have the same case, can easily fit the AIO for CPU in the top of the case that leaves 2 rear positions, 2 floor positions and 2 front positions for AIO's, also you can flip some stuff in the case round to create more side orientated positions
 
machinebummer said:
I'm a noob and coward when it comes to overclocking ha! Especially CPUs, I'm very noob with them.

Last time I Overclocked, I think killed my 8800GT :D
Click to expand...

Consider an upgrade to a 4790k maybe, I don't bother overclocking (Also a noob) so I went with the 4790k and it's a great cpu for gaming on stock clocks, Easily the best stock clock cpu on the market and thanks to the boosted clocks I imagine it will give plenty of years service before you're forced to upgrade again.

Perfect for a ITX build where you want to go with stock clocks due to temps.
 
C35799Gamble said:
Impressive :) thanks for that.

Is it possible to run 2 of these cards on a single rad? Or replace the rad with a larger one and stick 2 on it? Or would you have pump efficiency issues?
Click to expand...

Yes, but they are AIO units - they come all pre-fitted and you'd void your warranty cutting into the tubes.

EK are already saying they will soon have and are showing pics of custom waterblocks (so you could remove the cooler and tubes and rad whole for later refitting) for use with a-la-carte WC systems.

See elsewhere several times in this thread or on the web - e.g. http://www.fudzilla.com/news/graphics/38089-ek-water-blocks-working-on-fury-x-water-block
 
Last edited:
Time for a few more benchmarks. :)

WOFLKo8.jpg

4x FuryX @1050/500Mhz
1080P Maximum Settings
DX11

4Vb1ZwL.jpg


4xFury X @1125/500Mhz
1080P Maximum Settings
DX11

51h7w1Y.jpg


Overclocking here is only producing a 3.4% increase in FPS from a 7.5% overclock due to the fact there is some cpu bottlenecking going on. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom