I'm not sure if there will even be a points system for the ps3. It may not be configurable at all, it may be factory set to fold and the user may not be able to select a team or change settings or anything... I hope thats not the case but it seems likely.kinnison said:Reading this discussion, I can't help wondering what the points system is going to be like for the PS3 version of folding when that comes out.. Potentially a PS3 could outperform any PC around by a factor of 10 or more, will that mean that they get 5000ppd?? I doubt it somehow, everyone with ordindary PC's would probably just give up!
I just built one recently, it folds 24/7 for the team.oceaness said:Am building a MCPC to go under the TV.
I didn't have to. Build it around an Antec nsk 2400 or fusion (same case, fusion has a few extras). It has a pair of very quiet 120mm fans, and quiet psu fan, harddisk silencing rubber gromits, rubber feet, and the best airflow i have ever experienced in a case. Ohh and its only around £60 for the nsk.oceaness said:Lol. Yep same problem, I said I was going to build a media center PC to go under the TV and oh dear no it's far to noisey.
Just out of interest how did you silence yours?
Ok thanks.SiriusB said:EDIT: The console client has the exact same options as the CPU client. Like with any client make sure the machine ID is unique, and you will also need to set the CPU utilisation to LOW as opposed to Idle. Not sure why this is, Concorde told me to
SiriusB
Thanks. I've now done an update to the quick guide and have finished the gpu folding guide. Feel free to make suggestions for improvements to it.BillytheImpaler said:Stanford mirror of the driver: http://folding.stanford.edu/release/6-5_xp-2k_dd_ccc_wdm_enu_32464.exe
ATi mirror of the driver: http://support.ati.com/ics/support/default.asp?deptID=894&task=knowledge&questionID=22264
Add what?BillytheImpaler said:Whenever you think it's ready, Joe, I'll add it to the blank post in the sticky reserved for the GPU-howto. Let me know.
I think i asked that before and it was a yes. They do seem to be getting quite a good ppd apparently.VeNT said:so,
if you've a dual core system, is it worth running the GPU client on current PPD?
even with the loss of one of the cores?
Stanford said they could easily reduce the polling so i would imagine you would have to have a very slow cpu before it has an impact.shadowscotland said:Any one running their x1900 on a lower spec rig? and if so is it getting the same 600ppd?
That suggests it may even be cpu limited...?shadowscotland said:From stan's logs in the other thread - he answered my question as the x1900 in his 4000+ was folding slower that the x1900 in his C2D's (yes that's 3 Gpu clients )