Soldato
My point was that I don't judge on technically ability because it becomes quite difficult to do so purely on that basis alone. There are many who do, and those that do are obviously attracted to that side of playing.tTz said:Well don't judge them on technical ability then, judge them on whose music gives you the most enjoyment and inspiration...if we were judging on technical abillity, we'd all be naming some tasteless shredder like MAB, but it looks to me like people are naming guitarist who they enjoy listening to, rather than technically brilliant ones.
Indeed. I don't think I made myself clear enough though. Some guitarists are very technically good, which is fine. But being the way I am, I'd also put great song writers up there with great technical guitarists. Which is why I would put someone like Steve Vai alongside Elliott Smith (who, incidentally, was a great guitarist. He was always such an unassuming guitar player that his technical ability was often overlooked because of his great songwriting ability)tTz said:A case in point would be Hendrix - I've said before on this forum (somewhere lost in the mists of time) that I hate Hendrix's music, and I think even his more ardent fans would agree that his technical ability wasn't too great, yet they still claim he's the 'greatest'. The moral of this post is, screw technical ability, choose someone who greats great tunes!
Last edited: