• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The GTX Titan X owners thread.

User Videos.



GPU TitanX @1075/1752, Content NV Physx Flex SDK, CPU 4790k @4.4, Resolution 1080p, Dicehunter, Drivers 350.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Unreal Kite demo, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 1080p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Alien Isolation maxed, no AA , CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Batman Asylum & City maxed, no AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Batman Origins maxed, no AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Heaven & Valley, no AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Dirt Rally maxed, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 350.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Bioshock maxed, no AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 350.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Mafia II maxed, no AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Sleeping Dogs maxed, no AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Thief maxed, no AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Tomb Raider maxed, no AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Hitman maxed, no AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content World in Conflict maxed, no AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Grid 2 maxed, no AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Grid Autosport maxed, no AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12




GPU TitanX @1400/2000, Content Dirt 3 & Showdown maxed, inc AA, CPU 4790k @4.8, Resolution 2160p, Dicehunter, Drivers 353.12



If you have any user videos you want to share of the TitanX in action please post the link and I will place them here.

You will also need to post the following info please.

The CPU and clockspeed.

The clockspeeds used on the TitanX(s).

The resolution being used.

The drivers used.

What the video is about, ie playing BF4 on map X.
iHFsZaC.png
 
Last edited:
Stranger things have happened at sea, but for the product and the price paid it's a pants launch :)

What I don't get is EKWB have waterblocks available for the card and some of us will actually receive the blocks before we get the cards.

This means that the card has been in existence and doing the rounds for a while for EKWB to have blocks ready so why the paper launch for the Titan X ?
 
assatm: its a bit hit and miss to be honest, most of the time its down to the game being programmed badly. I find that if you wait 3 months after launch and then play the game your experience is much better than if you try and play it before then. Some games work well on launch day.

In terms of micro-stutter well I can say that at 4k the 980 has micro-stutter all over the place. Generally, I don't see this in two card mode at 1080p or 1440p unless the game is to blame i.e. a ubisoft product. I personally think that the general poor 4k perf. on the 980 is down to the memory bus being limited to 256-bit. 1080p and 1440p perf. has been stellar.

I think the TX's larger bus and extra vram legroom will help solve these problems.

G-sync was made for 4k, its a shame that TV's don't support it.

I blame it on AMD !!!!!

Going back a year if a game was a Gaming Evolved title you could near enough guarantee that NVidia would go out of their way to make sure it had fantastic SLI support. Now that AMD are a bit off form it seems NVidia are not bothered either. Having said that it could be just my imagination.:D
 
Back
Top Bottom